From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C860BA04FD; Mon, 30 May 2022 12:43:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD6642B75; Mon, 30 May 2022 12:43:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam10on2041.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.93.41]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C49400D6 for ; Mon, 30 May 2022 12:43:45 +0200 (CEST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=U7HzmmpoA8Ixn9LzJUEH3562933HHYc/S0YWrNOZ9kfnpo2qVISlf9FatP0+E+g6yUTi45ZZzNk6lCDmxv1ECO734ljx0QXQ1/vC6M1nHmtvebMCRicDPGtVw6/ZROAEG/k2cwGFZN2xc2/em98Xgzm+RCEpLpM9uuB2hNxP6RXqmGLo5pgdrS2CEI8cZQ0nvckhg7qAXbLGVQKAyYf8IHp9d1GCRK+uB7atlhuhaJbdlQfyN17MNZsOTEKiyHePTfcNbGOgdTbEzqQfl695xLTN3ct2RBQgG6nW+Gj19q0tga/iT2P3P7j9aN6/PV1+XfWrwKkEQa68ba7HNYCd6g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=u2/aWYi8DFQtZEIN6F1bpEgJDadKDcZEQMtLyQ5d2uk=; b=KdZCY1J23uqfSsjF72wm3o50Sf1SyhY3jMY+XXcGG/ROhY6Tg19EnGWRSU0hwuzytXzQXJGOBG7/vUwnwUuA1eFqP+zClO3rmC6ESsvNWGeb1XJNYgrwLfhtvZuOvLEoOeNMyrNh/H4tycISSqktd12cuiZBGvlgirABdJNtAvCRCgigiewzP3UfnuZ6RGZmDjOfIdGJEBRy63g+nhXRn6VIclZV09HEBo0HwvY7aMtYfuXN+b54Jvj+gd8Dm0rv4WjD3Ttlftey2fOpiiEAbJvyTHOU2pEm+qnohqQFjPfLcZunACi1IA99K8sdkeSa34seuOAmfSSgTnRIGAMhuQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 149.199.80.198) smtp.rcpttodomain=gmail.com smtp.mailfrom=xilinx.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=xilinx.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xilinx.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-xilinx-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=u2/aWYi8DFQtZEIN6F1bpEgJDadKDcZEQMtLyQ5d2uk=; b=nSrtZEgo5K01IoUh4+Gv2FGIT6Yx/QpAuNrs7oVl4Sy89lpUT1xJcEdatu8xOeX6Q1Oa0EUrQt010Te1DdU76NQsE5pQMG+lxKZrZY+w4vG+u1RShT2EPXaZxmpfRbPTKBc6hAqcinG9fNg0nznd9ccz0RIh2hN1xKqEyCrspYM= Received: from SN4PR0801CA0014.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:803:29::24) by CH2PR02MB7030.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:610:87::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5293.13; Mon, 30 May 2022 10:43:44 +0000 Received: from SN1NAM02FT0018.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:803:29:cafe::68) by SN4PR0801CA0014.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:803:29::24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5293.13 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 30 May 2022 10:43:43 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 149.199.80.198) smtp.mailfrom=xilinx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=xilinx.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of xilinx.com designates 149.199.80.198 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=149.199.80.198; helo=xir-pvapexch02.xlnx.xilinx.com; pr=C Received: from xir-pvapexch02.xlnx.xilinx.com (149.199.80.198) by SN1NAM02FT0018.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.97.5.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.20.5293.13 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 30 May 2022 10:43:42 +0000 Received: from xir-pvapexch02.xlnx.xilinx.com (172.21.17.17) by xir-pvapexch02.xlnx.xilinx.com (172.21.17.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.14; Mon, 30 May 2022 11:43:36 +0100 Received: from smtp.xilinx.com (172.21.105.198) by xir-pvapexch02.xlnx.xilinx.com (172.21.17.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2176.14 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 30 May 2022 11:43:36 +0100 Envelope-to: koncept1@gmail.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com, ben.magistro@trinitycyber.com, dev@dpdk.org Received: from [10.71.118.169] (port=53988) by smtp.xilinx.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90) (envelope-from ) id 1nvcs3-0003C6-KX; Mon, 30 May 2022 11:43:36 +0100 Message-ID: <81b91266-a3af-5994-284f-30cef98c9e29@xilinx.com> Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 11:43:35 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1 Subject: Re: Confirm if rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum_verify should be experimental Content-Language: en-US To: Ben Magistro , Olivier Matz CC: , References: From: Ferruh Yigit In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: a6ce67c4-41d3-49e0-1ac6-08da4229446f X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: CH2PR02MB7030:EE_ X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:149.199.80.198; CTRY:IE; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:CAL; SFV:NSPM; H:xir-pvapexch02.xlnx.xilinx.com; PTR:unknown-80-198.xilinx.com; CAT:NONE; SFS:(13230001)(4636009)(46966006)(36840700001)(40470700004)(8936002)(2906002)(4326008)(40460700003)(2616005)(7636003)(356005)(44832011)(9786002)(8676002)(31696002)(53546011)(110136005)(336012)(186003)(316002)(54906003)(426003)(82310400005)(508600001)(36860700001)(31686004)(70206006)(70586007)(26005)(4744005)(966005)(36756003)(47076005)(83380400001)(5660300002)(50156003)(43740500002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: xilinx.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 May 2022 10:43:42.8227 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a6ce67c4-41d3-49e0-1ac6-08da4229446f X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 657af505-d5df-48d0-8300-c31994686c5c X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=657af505-d5df-48d0-8300-c31994686c5c; Ip=[149.199.80.198]; Helo=[xir-pvapexch02.xlnx.xilinx.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: SN1NAM02FT0018.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CH2PR02MB7030 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On 5/26/2022 10:39 PM, Ben Magistro wrote: > [CAUTION: External Email] > This may simply be a docs and signature mismatch (or macro wasn't > available at the time, didn't check that aspect) but the function > rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum_verify() is marked as experimental in the > signature but not in the associated function comments (doxygen).  Should > this function be considered experimental and the docs section updated or > is this considered a stable function and the signature should updated? > > Introduced in > https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210630135158.8108-4-olivier.matz@6wind.com/ > > > Thanks, > > Ben Magistro Hi Ben, It looks like API is still experimental but doxygen comment is not added, if Oliver agrees it can be an option to remove the experimental tag at this stage of the API.