From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B098645702; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 18:06:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8675940E25; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 18:06:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.145]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD5840E13 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 18:06:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailfout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC2E1380283; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 12:06:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 31 Jul 2024 12:06:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1722441997; x=1722528397; bh=AWWDp7Tu8KYkclih9RNHkuTPuBkC4fGnNsg7xayR5yo=; b= mdrpNB2nBTJa1IvCQVclVWans4pmYr0TnK7rBN6htFgOHm1ZasEhKiwpAkagfrXw rgZlKo7UrmjSiFweWwoHl4yrp41WKBi+s8XagVbSLqVFnJdPB0RYsEe5rDD3M+iP wq9Re/FsRpTzEsthfr6/OGdTRIb/1zdrLjlkSlp4tNX35E0yhyNxNYJRLv+fZLuy RFlOVZddLti5DWQtGP9FjOb+93wmtXveN5P2qOfmw2XwxHJG3l5DQyOwMA+ROcqZ XWkO2PgU2lvnsp2Zz+wA8b/UidXl6WhqMKmyFg1yxfaZl7TrZ0SmxaTf96XZbJc+ PqJ93pU7irgRq3gk11sP9A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1722441997; x= 1722528397; bh=AWWDp7Tu8KYkclih9RNHkuTPuBkC4fGnNsg7xayR5yo=; b=J jjlJsjNW3w+msUxsbUmCmjQFK4mQVTWu1b6IWmN54aJZUMaFLxDfDyUUCM8H/sGF G0Ko4JwJe2avsFWGgSB32umqbiMeJeRXlUUHGjCMdmQguzhp96h5riMq/uLHueKk o2GGxlNk0wSLW4TPuqDNoG+17+gO3wLE7o/TCQdXIon5ZwTgbEqEHuRc4/lkBc6D yd22UeapCpi0JjB6y3cVq8wwcR/+w5HyoMVXDXWu6DGtnvOLj0HQwIMhQ0l9dxTa AC72rnOf+QJ1NKl57HVEyIZiC7wqXwJB2JFo8qS9VfJF74dAhSW8ZAC6LNam7alN aMq5suc9LvV47uDhktfWg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrjeeigdeljecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvvefufffkjghfggfgtgesthhqre dttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshes mhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeegtddtleejjeegffekke ektdejvedtheevtdekiedvueeuvdeiuddvleevjeeujeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigv pedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrd hnvghtpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedt X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 12:06:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Amit Prakash Shukla Cc: dev@dpdk.org, fengchengwen@huawei.com, kevin.laatz@intel.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, conor.walsh@intel.com, gmuthukrishn@marvell.com, vvelumuri@marvell.com, g.singh@nxp.com, sachin.saxena@oss.nxp.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, dev@dpdk.org, jerinj@marvell.com, vattunuru@marvell.com, anoobj@marvell.com, mb@smartsharesystems.com, Jerin Jacob Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] doc: announce changes to dma device structures Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 18:06:33 +0200 Message-ID: <8204600.JRmrKFJ9eK@thomas> In-Reply-To: <3321231.G96rZvMJ2N@thomas> References: <20240730125302.2132377-1-amitprakashs@marvell.com> <3321231.G96rZvMJ2N@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 31/07/2024 13:01, Thomas Monjalon: > 30/07/2024 19:27, Jerin Jacob: > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 8:25=E2=80=AFPM Amit Prakash Shukla > > wrote: > > > > > > A new flag RTE_DMA_CAPA_QOS will be introduced to advertise dma > > > device's QoS capability. In order to support the parameters for this > > > flag, new fields will be added in rte_dma_info and rte_dma_conf > > > structures to get device supported priority levels and to configure t= he > > > required priority level. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Vamsi Attunuru > > > Signed-off-by: Amit Prakash Shukla > >=20 > >=20 > > Acked-by: Jerin Jacob >=20 > Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon The RFC and the deprecation notices are sent a bit late. We cannot conclude there is consensus. I propose to raise it to the techboard if an ABI breakage is still required= for 24.11. As dmadev is quite new, I don't think it is big issue.