From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F63FA48F for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 01:49:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35C020D5D; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 19:49:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 15 Jan 2018 19:49:33 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=RfB7CQUCm0p8jOv34lJn/oFND1 0Gu0qAVH5TqrOWYiQ=; b=bDfvifkpBd3JNbk58ujpGFUWNi+RxJFW/LHgHrLpnA vXEnvUG/yQZcUnRj1lGV35GNeuH80s/Ngrn3bF9/TtV1TlhAt+4O+VvHh1HERMC/ Ls8V1QLEDDrySCSicqjVHRyWJcWaoWAsmGsvIe4vibK/LvUp9GWRXK6pvFgib5R3 Y= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=RfB7CQ UCm0p8jOv34lJn/oFND10Gu0qAVH5TqrOWYiQ=; b=XzlWqjh4YJn6OSBwLSfXZV xJ6VfaXzgOLzKmdZ6om9RLyaDjQY+6iXspczGXnUwhgj9vOIHocS5yiCpyaS8+j3 lPrANmFRFw6yAuzivwybzGKojZoFjP0DorvVjREBAAOGHLuVbiMFh6VrnzSTqaZf XfN2LCbb4F+kIEaWkw1Nq9oifcnBsEqe+YVmE2/LMLUHmI7DRHnHdVhH7EAK0FKU PiMeVLi/SDPXnnS6NoDm0myMSToXvjU7QY945fqUhy8MkpEqRFKtdTFskxGZJgmt YYBSKXkZ8fMBjuKcpq0+GMCdDlKaP8CrW2bHV8ErzsB2QTU+13tEl+jetMsjoPbA == X-ME-Sender: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 763FB7E3D7; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 19:49:33 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Erik Gabriel Carrillo Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Pavan Nikhilesh , rsanford@akamai.com Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 01:49:01 +0100 Message-ID: <8217763.uGXFGyA18d@xps> In-Reply-To: <20180113050632.cexa2hlfnscoq2im@Pavan-LT> References: <1515792665-6890-1-git-send-email-erik.g.carrillo@intel.com> <20180113050632.cexa2hlfnscoq2im@Pavan-LT> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] timer: fix reset on service cores X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:49:34 -0000 13/01/2018 06:06, Pavan Nikhilesh: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 03:31:05PM -0600, Erik Gabriel Carrillo wrote: > > The return value of rte_lcore_has_role is misinterpreted in the timer > > reset function. The return values of rte_lcore_has_role will be changed > > in a future DPDK release, but this commit fixes this call site until > > that happens. > > > > Fixes: 351f463456f8 ("timer: allow reset on service cores") > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > > > Signed-off-by: Erik Gabriel Carrillo > Acked-by: Pavan Nikhilesh Applied, thanks