From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D118A0032; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 13:43:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E8341109; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 13:43:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from shelob.oktetlabs.ru (shelob.oktetlabs.ru [91.220.146.113]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737BC400D4 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 13:43:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.39] (unknown [188.170.75.69]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shelob.oktetlabs.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4441ECB; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 14:43:04 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 shelob.oktetlabs.ru 4441ECB DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=oktetlabs.ru; s=default; t=1657626184; bh=H1LhXSUobCTwzgmCXVJU78VD+cOGfm7xLmHIlQKPORM=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=vDZYQzk6HFvrFR9QC+tA9zL+AQiqxv0UXQuBBUyZRQ9sh6yKFzeE7goOf9YG41EDZ qkYZZlgplobYCVgOhsN7Z67+VAcib7nUz0DLv7Vvxk/ANXK9RUNGBUxXl7GMwFMDLm 2Owbr43RfX1TZJWIZsm2IqSlyIYFtXRJpM81V9ws= Message-ID: <824ea4bc-38ba-06f0-95ad-19d3dbd10e2e@oktetlabs.ru> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 14:43:03 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: announce header split deprecation Content-Language: en-US To: Ray Kinsella , xuan.ding@intel.com Cc: thomas@monjalon.net, stephen@networkplumber.org, mb@smartsharesystems.com, dev@dpdk.org References: <20220523142016.44451-1-xuan.ding@intel.com> <87mtf7yo2l.fsf@mdr78.vserver.site> From: Andrew Rybchenko In-Reply-To: <87mtf7yo2l.fsf@mdr78.vserver.site> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On 5/24/22 17:58, Ray Kinsella wrote: > > xuan.ding@intel.com writes: > >> From: Xuan Ding >> >> RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_HEADER_SPLIT offload was introduced some time ago to >> substitute bit-field header_split in struct rte_eth_rxmode. It allows >> to enable header split offload with the header size controlled using >> split_hdr_size in the same structure. >> >> Right now, no single PMD actually supports RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_HEADER_SPLIT >> with above definition. Many examples and test apps initialize the field >> to 0 explicitly. The most of drivers simply ignore split_hdr_size since >> the offload is not advertised, but some double-check that its value is 0. >> >> So the RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_HEADER_SPLIT and split_header_size field >> will be removed in DPDK 22.11. >> >> Signed-off-by: Xuan Ding > > > Acked-by: Ray Kinsella Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko