From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 175D3A0032; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 23:09:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0803B40687; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 23:09:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FCD340156 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 23:09:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E6A32004CE; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 17:09:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 11 Jul 2022 17:09:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1657573756; x= 1657660156; bh=LGm3DHIkRhGt9f8orKSbqOBBmFQ3CPOITmzKeNQqBH4=; b=C 5xNY64MJ8e/M9K+VhSCL5MCPMWRXIgTl9TtYmCM3yefpUXDwsMZfeHD+v9huFv5X iiUfu74C7TVwFyy1kAc45IyGJGUMpQZm9ZOc4mWbDFS2Vh57Y/I4CTDUUx1Xp+OV ng4F0qK/bedGt3mBXd8IZYKsvriEs2+sY3ZXfMsKjyRyIkSz5A0f8uiJaQ9NNE1T LnfFjdfaQNhjEOnKNDL1Tfruk8Ufog91A8xGV9X96yESqJPNCe/Qo9DP0FENTDGe 545p8Jzc4Kvq0ZhzIVi4kZnEncNf2Rznfa3m24CP6FO7wkH/MVbxvRfrRbsGoMkM JMSMaN5Kvchu1nPEoD6qg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1657573756; x= 1657660156; bh=LGm3DHIkRhGt9f8orKSbqOBBmFQ3CPOITmzKeNQqBH4=; b=D 3oRM1akmQ26GIiWX8uCH9UL9xEV0JLf1UxV8vt+i92JjBGyVL8McIgiMr3cEUe8M zPDtqcaP5RNkNV2/IuWdAJrjZ70UFS+h6vebi6G4hGQc5AdpeHsgXLvIdV4XEXLE AuHmABF2mfR9NUjeRSgnEczfpGG/9kGw0vGYxaEsuORsm+lsP/7jtZ+9A4jmjBDV t0ciP5I64iNDs6iftm5IvrOt+rQXg6z7WxVA9V0NlRk2XAbgkD4OLRlZ1zHcz6wZ VEKGvz04fGzQ6nz54Resa4fAHB2q+Fnw9UdS5BTuSRs/ARtbixLtOhY6Kgs0VH/K DC1gRwdSP2XoniDGwHv6w== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrudejfedgudehjecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvfevufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhho mhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqne cuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdejieeifeehtdffgfdvleetueeffeehueejgfeuteeftddt ieekgfekudehtdfgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilh hfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 17:09:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Burakov, Anatoly" , Dmitry Kozlyuk Cc: Stanislaw Kardach , dev@dpdk.org, upstream@semihalf.com, Heinrich Schuchardt , David Marchand Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] doc: expand description of no-huge and PMD issue Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 23:09:14 +0200 Message-ID: <8421189.kIvqiD65kZ@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20220609134011.725343-1-kda@semihalf.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 13/06/2022 11:31, David Marchand: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 3:40 PM Stanislaw Kardach wrote: > > > > Add more details to the description of a known issue of PMDs not being > > usable when --no-huge EAL command line parameter is used. The issue > > actually happens whenever there is a need for physical addresses, even > > when there is no PMD attached. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Kardach > > Anatoly, Dmitry, opinions? > Thanks. Why nobody is reviewing doc?