From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AE552BD6 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 02:47:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Nov 2016 17:47:01 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,640,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="31288620" Received: from fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.205]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Nov 2016 17:47:01 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx118.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.18) by fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.205) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 17:47:00 -0800 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.70) by fmsmsx118.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 17:47:00 -0800 Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.96]) by SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.142]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 09:46:58 +0800 From: "Liu, Yong" To: Thomas Monjalon CC: "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-announce] DPDK 16.11 released Thread-Index: AQHSPfyeEuEs6hV+TE2yJROjuolZMaDZQAUQ Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 01:46:57 +0000 Message-ID: <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E6032660B@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <3980631.9YyyMl1DK9@xps13> In-Reply-To: <3980631.9YyyMl1DK9@xps13> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiODNhMDE3ODYtNzk3Yy00NmViLTllZGYtOTM1Y2NiYjllMTNiIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE1LjkuNi42IiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6Ikg4N1dTYWxucUxteDR5MUdaWVwvRCszMDdrQ2krUnppN0RMUlVyVGZDeGZ3PSJ9 x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-announce] DPDK 16.11 released X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 01:47:02 -0000 Thomas, it's great to hear that DPDK16.11 released just in time. As prospect for 17.02, our intel validation team have some concern about th= e release date. The official day off for Chinese Sprint Festival holiday will be from 27th = Jan to 3th Feb. Most of our members may ask for more days leave either before or after the = official day off. >>From our previous experience, it will take 3~4 weeks to do the full functio= n and performance test. If the first candidate release in the middle of Jan, we can do first round = of validation and raise issues to developers. And after the holiday, we can keep on the validation process and finish in = two weeks. If release date is after Feb, it will be hard for us to cover all cases in = release window. Thanks, DPDK STV team > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 6:23 AM > To: announce@dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-announce] DPDK 16.11 released >=20 > The new features for the 17.02 cycle must be submitted before December 4. > There is a long list of expected works: > http://dpdk.org/dev/roadmap > It means we will have a huge workload to properly review all the new stuf= f > before the end of the year. Do not forget to help reviewing patches from > others if we want to have a chance to integrate everything in time. >=20 >=20 > Thanks everyone