DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Liu, Yong" <yong.liu@intel.com>
To: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Bie, Tiwei" <tiwei.bie@intel.com>,
	"maxime.coquelin@redhat.com" <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 02/13] add vhost packed ring fast enqueue function
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 01:15:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E633339BD@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92467053-2cdc-300d-410b-c326924d676d@samsung.com>

Thank, Ilya.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ilya Maximets [mailto:i.maximets@samsung.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2019 7:38 PM
> To: Liu, Yong <yong.liu@intel.com>; Bie, Tiwei <tiwei.bie@intel.com>;
> maxime.coquelin@redhat.com; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 02/13] add vhost packed ring fast enqueue
> function
> 
> On 08.07.2019 20:13, Marvin Liu wrote:
> > In fast enqueue function, will first check whether descriptors are
> > cache aligned. Fast enqueue function will check prerequisites in the
> > beginning. Fast enqueue function do not support chained mbufs, normal
> > function will handle that.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marvin Liu <yong.liu@intel.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h
> > index 884befa85..f24026acd 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h
> > @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@
> >
> >  #define VHOST_LOG_CACHE_NR 32
> >
> > +/* Used in fast packed ring functions */
> > +#define PACKED_DESC_PER_CACHELINE (RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE / sizeof(struct
> vring_packed_desc))
> >  /**
> >   * Structure contains buffer address, length and descriptor index
> >   * from vring to do scatter RX.
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> > index 003aec1d4..b877510da 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
> > @@ -897,6 +897,115 @@ virtio_dev_rx_split(struct virtio_net *dev, struct
> vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> >  	return pkt_idx;
> >  }
> >
> > +static __rte_always_inline uint16_t
> > +virtio_dev_rx_fast_packed(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue
> *vq,
> > +		struct rte_mbuf **pkts)
> > +{
> > +	bool wrap_counter = vq->avail_wrap_counter;
> > +	struct vring_packed_desc *descs = vq->desc_packed;
> > +	uint16_t avail_idx = vq->last_avail_idx;
> > +	uint64_t desc_addr, desc_addr1, desc_addr2, desc_addr3, len, len1,
> > +		len2, len3;
> > +	struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *hdr, *hdr1, *hdr2, *hdr3;
> > +	uint32_t buf_offset = dev->vhost_hlen;
> > +
> > +	if (unlikely(avail_idx & 0x3))
> > +		return -1;
> > +
> > +	if (unlikely(avail_idx < (vq->size - PACKED_DESC_PER_CACHELINE)))
> 
> Doe it makes sense to check this?
> If this condition is not 'true', all the code below will access incorrect
> memory.
> 
Sorry, this condition should be likely:)

> > +		rte_prefetch0((void *)(uintptr_t)&descs[avail_idx +
> > +			PACKED_DESC_PER_CACHELINE]);
> > +	else
> > +		rte_prefetch0((void *)(uintptr_t)&descs[0]);
> > +
> > +	if (unlikely((pkts[0]->next != NULL) |
> > +		(pkts[1]->next != NULL) |
> > +		(pkts[2]->next != NULL) |
> > +		(pkts[3]->next != NULL)))
> > +		return -1;
> > +
> > +	if (unlikely(!desc_is_avail(&descs[avail_idx], wrap_counter)) |
> > +		unlikely(!desc_is_avail(&descs[avail_idx + 1], wrap_counter)) |
> > +		unlikely(!desc_is_avail(&descs[avail_idx + 2], wrap_counter)) |
> > +		unlikely(!desc_is_avail(&descs[avail_idx + 3], wrap_counter)))
> > +		return 1;
> > +
> > +	rte_smp_rmb();
> > +
> > +	len = descs[avail_idx].len;
> > +	len1 = descs[avail_idx + 1].len;
> > +	len2 = descs[avail_idx + 2].len;
> > +	len3 = descs[avail_idx + 3].len;
> > +
> > +	if (unlikely((pkts[0]->pkt_len > (len - buf_offset)) |
> > +		(pkts[1]->pkt_len > (len1 - buf_offset)) |
> > +		(pkts[2]->pkt_len > (len2 - buf_offset)) |
> > +		(pkts[3]->pkt_len > (len3 - buf_offset))))
> > +		return -1;
> > +
> > +	desc_addr = vhost_iova_to_vva(dev, vq,
> > +			descs[avail_idx].addr,
> > +			&len,
> > +			VHOST_ACCESS_RW);
> > +
> > +	desc_addr1 = vhost_iova_to_vva(dev, vq,
> > +			descs[avail_idx + 1].addr,
> > +			&len1,
> > +			VHOST_ACCESS_RW);
> > +
> > +	desc_addr2 = vhost_iova_to_vva(dev, vq,
> > +			descs[avail_idx + 2].addr,
> > +			&len2,
> > +			VHOST_ACCESS_RW);
> > +
> > +	desc_addr3 = vhost_iova_to_vva(dev, vq,
> > +			descs[avail_idx + 3].addr,
> > +			&len3,
> > +			VHOST_ACCESS_RW);
> > +
> > +	if (unlikely((len != descs[avail_idx].len) |
> > +		(len1 != descs[avail_idx + 1].len) |
> > +		(len2 != descs[avail_idx + 2].len) |
> > +		(len3 != descs[avail_idx + 3].len)))
> > +		return -1;
> > +
> > +	hdr = (struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *)(uintptr_t)desc_addr;
> > +	hdr1 = (struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *)(uintptr_t)desc_addr1;
> > +	hdr2 = (struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *)(uintptr_t)desc_addr2;
> > +	hdr3 = (struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *)(uintptr_t)desc_addr3;
> > +
> > +	virtio_enqueue_offload(pkts[0], &hdr->hdr);
> > +	virtio_enqueue_offload(pkts[1], &hdr1->hdr);
> > +	virtio_enqueue_offload(pkts[2], &hdr2->hdr);
> > +	virtio_enqueue_offload(pkts[3], &hdr3->hdr);
> > +
> > +	len = pkts[0]->pkt_len + dev->vhost_hlen;
> > +	len1 = pkts[1]->pkt_len + dev->vhost_hlen;
> > +	len2 = pkts[2]->pkt_len + dev->vhost_hlen;
> > +	len3 = pkts[3]->pkt_len + dev->vhost_hlen;
> > +
> > +	vq->last_avail_idx += PACKED_DESC_PER_CACHELINE;
> 
> The whole function assumes that PACKED_DESC_PER_CACHELINE equals to 4,
> but if it's not, it will not work correctly.

Thanks for point out this, I just noticed that power8 has 128 bytes cache line.
Main idea here is to unroll the loop and check conditions first.
PACKED_DESC_PER_CACHELINE can be removed and renamed like FAST_BURST_NUM which hardcoded to four.

Best regards,
Marvin

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-09  1:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-08 17:13 [dpdk-dev] [RFC] vhost packed ring performance optimization Marvin Liu
2019-07-08 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 01/13] add vhost normal enqueue function Marvin Liu
2019-07-08 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 02/13] add vhost packed ring fast " Marvin Liu
     [not found]   ` <CGME20190708113801eucas1p25d89717d8b298790326077852c9933c8@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2019-07-08 11:37     ` Ilya Maximets
2019-07-09  1:15       ` Liu, Yong [this message]
2019-07-10  4:28   ` Jason Wang
2019-07-10  7:30     ` Liu, Yong
2019-07-11  4:11       ` Jason Wang
2019-07-11  9:49         ` Liu, Yong
2019-07-11  9:54           ` Jason Wang
2019-08-13  9:02             ` Liu, Yong
2019-07-11  8:35   ` Jason Wang
2019-07-11  9:37     ` Liu, Yong
2019-07-11  9:44       ` Jason Wang
2019-07-08 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 03/13] add vhost packed ring normal dequeue function Marvin Liu
2019-07-08 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 04/13] add vhost packed ring fast " Marvin Liu
2019-07-08 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 05/13] add enqueue shadow used descs update and flush functions Marvin Liu
2019-07-08 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 06/13] add vhost fast enqueue flush function Marvin Liu
2019-07-08 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 07/13] add vhost dequeue shadow descs update function Marvin Liu
2019-07-08 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 08/13] add vhost fast dequeue flush function Marvin Liu
2019-07-08 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 09/13] replace vhost enqueue packed ring function Marvin Liu
2019-07-08 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 10/13] add vhost fast zero copy dequeue " Marvin Liu
2019-07-08 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 11/13] replace vhost " Marvin Liu
2019-07-08 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 12/13] support inorder in vhost dequeue path Marvin Liu
2019-07-08 17:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 13/13] remove useless vhost functions Marvin Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E633339BD@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=yong.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=i.maximets@samsung.com \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).