From: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
To: Alvin Zhang <alvinx.zhang@intel.com>,
beilei.xing@intel.com, junfeng.guo@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, "Zhang,
Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix Rx packet statistics
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 17:00:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <863055cd-d436-6bdd-e6fe-2aa4d57db19a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210926075757.15116-1-alvinx.zhang@intel.com>
On 26/09/2021 08:57, Alvin Zhang wrote:
> Some packets are discarded by the NIC because they are larger than
> the MTU, these packets should be counted as "RX error" instead of
> "RX packet".
>
> The register 'GL_RXERR1' can count above discarded packets.
> This patch adds reading and calculation of the 'GL_RXERR1' counter
> when reporting DPDK statistics.
>
> Fixes: f4a91c38b4ad ("i40e: add extended stats")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Alvin Zhang <alvinx.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
It's a bit hard to understand the code for someone not familiar with the
i40e stats. I think it needs careful review from i40e maintainers. A few
questions below,
Did you test this with testpmd? Can you show an example of a test where
these packets are now correctly accounted for?
I see there is also an RXERR2 register that catches other errors, does
it need to be considered as well?
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> index 7a2a828..30a2cdf 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> @@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ static int i40e_sw_tunnel_filter_insert(struct i40e_pf *pf,
> /* store statistics names and its offset in stats structure */
> struct rte_i40e_xstats_name_off {
> char name[RTE_ETH_XSTATS_NAME_SIZE];
> - unsigned offset;
> + int offset;
It is unusual to see you changing an offset to an int. You are expecting
negative offsets?
> };
>
> static const struct rte_i40e_xstats_name_off rte_i40e_stats_strings[] = {
> @@ -542,6 +542,8 @@ struct rte_i40e_xstats_name_off {
> {"rx_dropped_packets", offsetof(struct i40e_eth_stats, rx_discards)},
> {"rx_unknown_protocol_packets", offsetof(struct i40e_eth_stats,
> rx_unknown_protocol)},
> + {"rx_err1", offsetof(struct i40e_pf, rx_err1) -
> + offsetof(struct i40e_pf, stats)},
rx_err1 is correct by datasheet but meaningless to a user. Suggest to
find a more descriptive name, or document what it is, or tell the user
to reference the datasheet.
> {"tx_unicast_packets", offsetof(struct i40e_eth_stats, tx_unicast)},
> {"tx_multicast_packets", offsetof(struct i40e_eth_stats, tx_multicast)},
> {"tx_broadcast_packets", offsetof(struct i40e_eth_stats, tx_broadcast)},
> @@ -3238,6 +3240,10 @@ void i40e_flex_payload_reg_set_default(struct i40e_hw *hw)
> pf->offset_loaded,
> &os->eth.rx_unknown_protocol,
> &ns->eth.rx_unknown_protocol);
> + i40e_stat_update_48(hw, I40E_GL_RXERR1_H(hw->pf_id + I40E_MAX_VF),
> + I40E_GL_RXERR1_L(hw->pf_id + I40E_MAX_VF),
> + pf->offset_loaded, &pf->rx_err1_offset,
> + &pf->rx_err1);
> i40e_stat_update_48_in_64(hw, I40E_GLPRT_GOTCH(hw->port),
> I40E_GLPRT_GOTCL(hw->port),
> pf->offset_loaded, &os->eth.tx_bytes,
> @@ -3437,7 +3443,8 @@ void i40e_flex_payload_reg_set_default(struct i40e_hw *hw)
> stats->ipackets = pf->main_vsi->eth_stats.rx_unicast +
> pf->main_vsi->eth_stats.rx_multicast +
> pf->main_vsi->eth_stats.rx_broadcast -
> - pf->main_vsi->eth_stats.rx_discards;
> + pf->main_vsi->eth_stats.rx_discards -
> + pf->rx_err1;
> stats->opackets = ns->eth.tx_unicast +
> ns->eth.tx_multicast +
> ns->eth.tx_broadcast;
> @@ -3451,7 +3458,8 @@ void i40e_flex_payload_reg_set_default(struct i40e_hw *hw)
> pf->main_vsi->eth_stats.rx_discards;
> stats->ierrors = ns->crc_errors +
> ns->rx_length_errors + ns->rx_undersize +
> - ns->rx_oversize + ns->rx_fragments + ns->rx_jabber;
> + ns->rx_oversize + ns->rx_fragments + ns->rx_jabber +
> + pf->rx_err1;
>
> if (pf->vfs) {
> for (i = 0; i < pf->vf_num; i++) {
> @@ -6232,6 +6240,8 @@ struct i40e_vsi *
> memset(&pf->stats_offset, 0, sizeof(struct i40e_hw_port_stats));
> memset(&pf->internal_stats, 0, sizeof(struct i40e_eth_stats));
> memset(&pf->internal_stats_offset, 0, sizeof(struct i40e_eth_stats));
> + pf->rx_err1 = 0;
> + pf->rx_err1_offset = 0;
>
> ret = i40e_pf_get_switch_config(pf);
> if (ret != I40E_SUCCESS) {
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h
> index cd6deab..846c8d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,13 @@
> #include "base/i40e_type.h"
> #include "base/virtchnl.h"
>
> +#define I40E_GL_RXERR1_H(_i) (0x00318004 + ((_i) * 8))
> +/**
> + * _i=0...143,
> + * counters 0-127 are for the 128 VFs,
> + * counters 128-143 are for the 16 PFs
> + */
> +
> #define I40E_VLAN_TAG_SIZE 4
>
> #define I40E_AQ_LEN 32
> @@ -1134,6 +1141,9 @@ struct i40e_pf {
>
> struct i40e_hw_port_stats stats_offset;
> struct i40e_hw_port_stats stats;
> + u64 rx_err1; /* rxerr1 */
> + u64 rx_err1_offset;
> +
> /* internal packet statistics, it should be excluded from the total */
> struct i40e_eth_stats internal_stats_offset;
> struct i40e_eth_stats internal_stats;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-27 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-26 7:57 Alvin Zhang
2021-09-27 16:00 ` Kevin Traynor [this message]
2021-09-28 2:12 ` Zhang, AlvinX
2021-09-28 8:53 ` Kevin Traynor
2021-09-28 3:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Alvin Zhang
2021-09-28 11:16 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2021-09-29 1:33 ` Zhang, AlvinX
2021-09-30 5:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Alvin Zhang
2021-10-08 6:17 ` Zhang, Qi Z
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=863055cd-d436-6bdd-e6fe-2aa4d57db19a@redhat.com \
--to=ktraynor@redhat.com \
--cc=alvinx.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=junfeng.guo@intel.com \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).