From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>, Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>,
Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: fix build for gcc 4.8.5
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 19:01:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87e36654-3d8d-c752-4a78-b0b4934d9a9b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200114175247.2930261-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
On 1/14/20 6:52 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> Build error:
> In function ‘ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro_bulk_alloc’:
> ../drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c:2209:24:
> error: ‘next_sc_entry’ may be used uninitialized in this function
> [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> next_sc_entry->fbuf = first_seg;
> ^
> http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2020-January/113891.html
>
> This is a compiler false positive and error not seen by newer compilers,
> or clang but to fix the warning initializing the complained variable.
You might want to add the RHEL7 GCC version I reproduced it on:
$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-39)
> According git bisect, no idea how:
> Fixes: 8a2e7ce976fd ("net/ixgbe: avoid multiple definitions of bool")
>
> Reported-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Tested-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> ---
> Cc: dharmik.thakkar@arm.com
> ---
> drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> index 13b06eb9c..30f890572 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> @@ -2028,7 +2028,7 @@ ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts,
> bool eop;
> struct ixgbe_rx_entry *rxe;
> struct ixgbe_scattered_rx_entry *sc_entry;
> - struct ixgbe_scattered_rx_entry *next_sc_entry;
> + struct ixgbe_scattered_rx_entry *next_sc_entry = NULL;
> struct ixgbe_rx_entry *next_rxe = NULL;
> struct rte_mbuf *first_seg;
> struct rte_mbuf *rxm;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-14 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-14 17:52 Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-14 18:01 ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2020-01-15 10:17 ` Ye Xiaolong
2020-01-15 16:50 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87e36654-3d8d-c752-4a78-b0b4934d9a9b@redhat.com \
--to=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dharmik.thakkar@arm.com \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=gavin.hu@arm.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=phil.yang@arm.com \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).