From: Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>
To: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>,
Narcisa Ana Maria Vasile <navasile@linux.microsoft.com>,
Dmitry Malloy <dmitrym@microsoft.com>,
Pallavi Kadam <pallavi.kadam@intel.com>,
xuan.ding@intel.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] vfio: add page-by-page mapping API
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 10:14:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ee07h1dd.fsf@mdr78.vserver.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <868198b65b2e067d0fc733eb30b78dd4f8337798.1635430146.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com> writes:
> Currently, there is no way to map memory for DMA in a way that allows
> unmapping it partially later, because some IOMMU's do not support
> partial unmapping. There is a workaround of mapping all of these
> segments separately, but this is inconvenient and silly, so this
> commit adds a proper API that does it.
>
> This commit relies on earlier infrastructure that was built out to
> support "chunking", as the concept of "chunks" is essentially the same
> as page size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v2:
> - Added checks for page alignment of supplied values
> - Added rte_errno values (similar to patch 103165 [1])
>
> [1] http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/e8c5e7ba089e2283c3cd67e4529e52fe49390eb9.1635428963.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com/
>
> lib/eal/freebsd/eal.c | 11 ++++
> lib/eal/include/rte_vfio.h | 33 ++++++++++++
> lib/eal/linux/eal_vfio.c | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> lib/eal/version.map | 1 +
> lib/eal/windows/eal.c | 11 ++++
> 5 files changed, 148 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/eal/freebsd/eal.c b/lib/eal/freebsd/eal.c
> index 9935356ed4..5ca5fa8e11 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/freebsd/eal.c
> +++ b/lib/eal/freebsd/eal.c
> @@ -1090,6 +1090,17 @@ rte_vfio_container_dma_map(__rte_unused int container_fd,
> return -1;
> }
>
> +int
> +rte_vfio_container_dma_map_paged(__rte_unused int container_fd,
> + __rte_unused uint64_t vaddr,
> + __rte_unused uint64_t iova,
> + __rte_unused uint64_t len,
> + __rte_unused uint64_t pagesz)
> +{
> + rte_errno = ENOTSUP;
> + return -1;
> +}
> +
> int
> rte_vfio_container_dma_unmap(__rte_unused int container_fd,
> __rte_unused uint64_t vaddr,
> diff --git a/lib/eal/include/rte_vfio.h b/lib/eal/include/rte_vfio.h
> index 2d90b36480..6afae2ccce 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/include/rte_vfio.h
> +++ b/lib/eal/include/rte_vfio.h
> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ extern "C" {
> #include <stdbool.h>
> #include <stdint.h>
>
> +#include <rte_compat.h>
> +
> /*
> * determine if VFIO is present on the system
> */
> @@ -331,6 +333,37 @@ int
> rte_vfio_container_dma_map(int container_fd, uint64_t vaddr,
> uint64_t iova, uint64_t len);
>
> +/**
> + * @warning
> + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change, or be removed, without prior notice
> + *
> + * Perform DMA mapping for devices in a container, mapping memory page-by-page.
> + *
> + * @param container_fd
> + * the specified container fd. Use RTE_VFIO_DEFAULT_CONTAINER_FD to
> + * use the default container.
> + *
> + * @param vaddr
> + * Starting virtual address of memory to be mapped.
> + *
> + * @param iova
> + * Starting IOVA address of memory to be mapped.
> + *
> + * @param len
> + * Length of memory segment being mapped.
> + *
> + * @param pagesz
> + * Page size of the underlying memory.
> + *
> + * @return
> + * 0 if successful
> + * <0 if failed
> + */
> +__rte_experimental
> +int
> +rte_vfio_container_dma_map_paged(int container_fd, uint64_t vaddr,
> + uint64_t iova, uint64_t len, uint64_t pagesz);
> +
> /**
> * Perform DMA unmapping for devices in a container.
> *
> diff --git a/lib/eal/linux/eal_vfio.c b/lib/eal/linux/eal_vfio.c
> index aa2087a2da..0f5b6c14af 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/linux/eal_vfio.c
> +++ b/lib/eal/linux/eal_vfio.c
> @@ -1872,11 +1872,12 @@ vfio_dma_mem_map(struct vfio_config *vfio_cfg, uint64_t vaddr, uint64_t iova,
>
> static int
> container_dma_map(struct vfio_config *vfio_cfg, uint64_t vaddr, uint64_t iova,
> - uint64_t len)
> + uint64_t len, uint64_t pagesz)
> {
> struct user_mem_map *new_map;
> struct user_mem_maps *user_mem_maps;
> bool has_partial_unmap;
> + uint64_t chunk_size;
> int ret = 0;
>
> user_mem_maps = &vfio_cfg->mem_maps;
> @@ -1887,19 +1888,37 @@ container_dma_map(struct vfio_config *vfio_cfg, uint64_t vaddr, uint64_t iova,
> ret = -1;
> goto out;
> }
> - /* map the entry */
> - if (vfio_dma_mem_map(vfio_cfg, vaddr, iova, len, 1)) {
> - /* technically, this will fail if there are currently no devices
> - * plugged in, even if a device were added later, this mapping
> - * might have succeeded. however, since we cannot verify if this
> - * is a valid mapping without having a device attached, consider
> - * this to be unsupported, because we can't just store any old
> - * mapping and pollute list of active mappings willy-nilly.
> - */
> - RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Couldn't map new region for DMA\n");
> - ret = -1;
> - goto out;
> +
> + /* technically, mapping will fail if there are currently no devices
> + * plugged in, even if a device were added later, this mapping might
> + * have succeeded. however, since we cannot verify if this is a valid
> + * mapping without having a device attached, consider this to be
> + * unsupported, because we can't just store any old mapping and pollute
> + * list of active mappings willy-nilly.
> + */
> +
> + /* if page size was not specified, map the entire segment in one go */
> + if (pagesz == 0) {
> + if (vfio_dma_mem_map(vfio_cfg, vaddr, iova, len, 1)) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Couldn't map new region for DMA\n");
> + ret = -1;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + } else {
> + /* otherwise, do mappings page-by-page */
> + uint64_t offset;
> +
> + for (offset = 0; offset < len; offset += pagesz) {
> + uint64_t va = vaddr + offset;
> + uint64_t io = iova + offset;
> + if (vfio_dma_mem_map(vfio_cfg, va, io, pagesz, 1)) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Couldn't map new region for DMA\n");
> + ret = -1;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> }
> +
> /* do we have partial unmap support? */
> has_partial_unmap = vfio_cfg->vfio_iommu_type->partial_unmap;
>
> @@ -1908,8 +1927,18 @@ container_dma_map(struct vfio_config *vfio_cfg, uint64_t vaddr, uint64_t iova,
> new_map->addr = vaddr;
> new_map->iova = iova;
> new_map->len = len;
> - /* for IOMMU types supporting partial unmap, we don't need chunking */
> - new_map->chunk = has_partial_unmap ? 0 : len;
> +
> + /*
> + * Chunking essentially serves largely the same purpose as page sizes,
> + * so for the purposes of this calculation, we treat them as the same.
> + * The reason we have page sizes is because we want to map things in a
> + * way that allows us to partially unmap later. Therefore, when IOMMU
> + * supports partial unmap, page size is irrelevant and can be ignored.
> + * For IOMMU that don't support partial unmap, page size is equivalent
> + * to chunk size.
> + */
> + chunk_size = pagesz == 0 ? len : pagesz;
> + new_map->chunk = has_partial_unmap ? 0 : chunk_size;
>
> compact_user_maps(user_mem_maps);
> out:
> @@ -2179,7 +2208,44 @@ rte_vfio_container_dma_map(int container_fd, uint64_t vaddr, uint64_t iova,
> return -1;
> }
>
> - return container_dma_map(vfio_cfg, vaddr, iova, len);
> + /* not having page size means we map entire segment */
> + return container_dma_map(vfio_cfg, vaddr, iova, len, 0);
> +}
> +
> +int
> +rte_vfio_container_dma_map_paged(int container_fd, uint64_t vaddr,
> + uint64_t iova, uint64_t len, uint64_t pagesz)
> +{
> + struct vfio_config *vfio_cfg;
> + bool va_aligned, iova_aligned, len_aligned, pagesz_aligned;
> +
> + /* avoid divide by zero first */
> + if (len == 0 || pagesz == 0) {
> + rte_errno = EINVAL;
> + return -1;
> + }
> + /*
> + * for direct maps, we leave it up to the kernel to decide whether the
> + * parameters are valid, but since we are going to map page-by-page and
> + * are expecting certain guarantees from the parameters we receive, we
> + * are going to check those here.
> + */
> + pagesz_aligned = rte_align64pow2(pagesz) == pagesz;
> + len_aligned = (len % pagesz) == 0;
> + va_aligned = RTE_ALIGN(vaddr, pagesz) == pagesz;
> + iova_aligned = RTE_ALIGN(iova, pagesz) == pagesz;
> + if (!pagesz_aligned || !len_aligned || !va_aligned || !iova_aligned) {
> + rte_errno = EINVAL;
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + vfio_cfg = get_vfio_cfg_by_container_fd(container_fd);
> + if (vfio_cfg == NULL) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Invalid VFIO container fd\n");
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + return container_dma_map(vfio_cfg, vaddr, iova, len, pagesz);
> }
>
> int
> @@ -2299,6 +2365,16 @@ rte_vfio_container_dma_map(__rte_unused int container_fd,
> return -1;
> }
>
> +int
> +rte_vfio_container_dma_map_paged(__rte_unused int container_fd,
> + __rte_unused uint64_t vaddr,
> + __rte_unused uint64_t iova,
> + __rte_unused uint64_t len,
> + __rte_unused uint64_t pagesz)
> +{
> + return -1;
> +}
> +
> int
> rte_vfio_container_dma_unmap(__rte_unused int container_fd,
> __rte_unused uint64_t vaddr,
> diff --git a/lib/eal/version.map b/lib/eal/version.map
> index 9d43655b66..82a34c2014 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/version.map
> +++ b/lib/eal/version.map
> @@ -420,6 +420,7 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
> rte_intr_instance_free;
> rte_intr_type_get;
> rte_intr_type_set;
Pls anontate with the target release in a comment.
> + rte_vfio_container_dma_map_paged;
> };
>
> INTERNAL {
> diff --git a/lib/eal/windows/eal.c b/lib/eal/windows/eal.c
> index f7ce1b6671..93771cb230 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/windows/eal.c
> +++ b/lib/eal/windows/eal.c
> @@ -484,6 +484,17 @@ rte_vfio_container_dma_map(__rte_unused int container_fd,
> return -1;
> }
>
> +int
> +rte_vfio_container_dma_map_paged(__rte_unused int container_fd,
> + __rte_unused uint64_t vaddr,
> + __rte_unused uint64_t iova,
> + __rte_unused uint64_t len,
> + __rte_unused uint64_t pagesz)
> +{
> + rte_errno = ENOTSUP;
> + return -1;
> +}
> +
> int
> rte_vfio_container_dma_unmap(__rte_unused int container_fd,
> __rte_unused uint64_t vaddr,
--
Regards, Ray K
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-02 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-10 11:27 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 " Anatoly Burakov
2021-09-10 12:31 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2021-09-29 10:18 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2021-10-28 8:18 ` David Marchand
2021-10-28 13:00 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2021-10-28 14:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Anatoly Burakov
2021-11-02 15:16 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2022-06-02 8:23 ` David Marchand
2023-07-03 23:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-07-04 12:51 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2022-06-02 9:14 ` Ray Kinsella [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ee07h1dd.fsf@mdr78.vserver.site \
--to=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
--cc=dmitrym@microsoft.com \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=navasile@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=pallavi.kadam@intel.com \
--cc=xuan.ding@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).