From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2657E1AEF3 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 15:49:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Sep 2017 06:49:39 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,413,1500966000"; d="scan'208";a="1173302962" Received: from aburakov-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.104]) ([10.237.220.104]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Sep 2017 06:49:37 -0700 To: Olivier Matz , dev@dpdk.org References: <20170907122033.17983-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com> From: "Burakov, Anatoly" Message-ID: <887d313b-0707-2096-9bff-e36d49052555@intel.com> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:49:36 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170907122033.17983-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ring: increase maximum ring size X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:49:40 -0000 On 07-Sep-17 1:20 PM, Olivier Matz wrote: > There is no reason to prevent ring from beeing larger than 0x0FFFFFFF. > Increase the maximum size to 0x7FFFFFFF, which is the maximum possible > without changing the code and the structure definition (size is stored > on a uint32_t). > > Link: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-September/074701.html > > Suggested-by: Venkatesh Nuthula > Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz > --- Checkpatch issues aside, Reviewed-by: Anatoly Burakov