From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44276A04B5; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:17:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B661D67B; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:17:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B2311D64A; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:17:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C895EA3; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:17:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:17:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= maVGVZIdrFV1TZdzgleWacoP66YTf3A9mQ92rSyMado=; b=v31wvKwuc7/vUNFb UmqHlLO9aWITgz6R+Iu6Ijv44pNdN0do7TLi3uQOIWZqtKWB+cl8NMMoieCessJl sxSbPsIxMw7F7RS1T4KZ+3bLU0eC/Ugh/LPewAcqm1+qzCIJBr/mXoi+f+tera09 hLZt6yIZu2WEj/TVFoRTCd3sOdUd3YgvMNK2XeXlw1i5RsVPs0DmMRo81fgjgVI6 g/EQs9f3//OM5KBUZxc3VAfaAjCMA1nZaYURtHsvFsZ8+nK5iqoHlOp8I258puz8 ssEju56/8zIY8KVu6LbTKc4XPzPA8p+Ga9MiUJM5laSgm4HmoDivSaoq2y86SIHH u/Fl9w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=maVGVZIdrFV1TZdzgleWacoP66YTf3A9mQ92rSyMa do=; b=bIifIiIK8P8FtCQQkQTy/Vp9JwNd37OWP8D/jSPgR4ARUufPQTDWGUUq4 x+UCCbQwGdVLnz1NxprEN8S9dMfOb9yIs9jL7SDdS+2UUmaQctqlysJNmCBTQNa4 QKgIxx6MwbqJR1pJlkTwdW4nD8qPSdNmQfGeZAQLT9jXWBikLcFLQVVIi5aVIgLZ 3ydxwcdVI3XAexTLstGxtbS7JaLio2DrlF1N4UiOozC7iOH5MAlnH8yPIonUBJS/ xe+KzMz0bsWy9fAdq7k3WuzdA+3+s6qqmzMPqaT5MECs+U0GiFRC8OjfOvUGUr2Z 326dN8eZYj2BAy/GxA24V/gqPTVuw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudeggdellecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei iedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 044FA3280059; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:16:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: David Marchand , techboard@dpdk.org, dev , Luca Boccassi , "Mcnamara, John" Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:16:58 +0200 Message-ID: <8969299.nXlkhJugru@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20200922072846.2b320a52@hermes.lan> References: <20200613000055.7909-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <9220848.TXtZX9Kk24@thomas> <20200922072846.2b320a52@hermes.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-techboard] [PATCH v3 00/10] rename blacklist/whitelist to block/allow X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 22/09/2020 16:28, Stephen Hemminger: > On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:01:27 +0200 > Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > 14/07/2020 07:33, Stephen Hemminger: > > > On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 17:06:11 +0200 > > > David Marchand wrote: > > > > > > > About deprecating existing API/EAL flags in this release, this should > > > > go through the standard deprecation process. > > > > I would go with introducing new options + full compatibility + a > > > > deprecation notice in the 20.08 release. > > > > The actual deprecation/API flagging will go in 20.11. > > > > Removal will come later. > > > > > > Like Make deprecation for 20.08 will leave the flags but add nag. > > > Want to make full removal in 20.11. Otherwise it will end up being 21.11 > > > which is too far out. > > > > Excuse me I may lack a bit of context. > > Are you asking for removing some EAL options without following > > the deprecation process? > > These were in the 20.08 deprecation notice. Do you mean this? " The ``master-lcore`` argument to testpmd will be replaced with ``initial-lcore``. The old ``master-lcore`` argument will produce a runtime notification in 20.11 release, and be removed completely in a future release. "