From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613143787 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 10:41:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Sep 2015 01:41:17 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,607,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="570369891" Received: from irsmsx102.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.155]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Sep 2015 01:41:16 -0700 Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.216]) by IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.160]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:41:14 +0100 From: "Iremonger, Bernard" To: Rahul Lakkireddy Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 16/20] cxgbe: copy pci device info to eth_dev data Thread-Index: AQHQ+h7v8OsgTi/1ukyQyFQTKuLZ555TMBUw Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 08:41:14 +0000 Message-ID: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C219F62871@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1443445418-18498-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> <1443445418-18498-17-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> <20150928185301.GA12770@scalar.blr.asicdesigners.com> In-Reply-To: <20150928185301.GA12770@scalar.blr.asicdesigners.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , Felix Marti , Kumar Sanghvi , Nirranjan Kirubaharan Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 16/20] cxgbe: copy pci device info to eth_dev data X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 08:41:18 -0000 Hi Rahul, > Out of curiosity, do you really need to add Intel copyright on top of sou= rce > file for a 3 line change in source file? I see that you have done the sam= e for > cisco, mellanox, broadcom and other vendors as well. >=20 > I don't claim to understand Copyright very well. However, I have seen in > other > open community projects like kernel.org where people many times do > significant > change in someone else's code and yet, don't normally add their own > copyright > to source files. >=20 > Care to explain what is the intention here with addition of Intel Copyrig= ht > statement? >=20 > Thanks, > Rahul I thought it was necessary to add the Intel Copyright, because I had modifi= ed the code. I will remove it in the next revision of the patchset. Regards, Bernard.