DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Iremonger, Bernard" <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: improve performance of vector PMD
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 15:33:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C219FE8C29@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836B3E8E5@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>

Hi Bruce,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ananyev,
> Konstantin
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 3:00 PM
> To: Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Zhang, Helin <helin.zhang@intel.com>; Wu, Jingjing
> <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: improve performance of vector PMD
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Richardson
> > Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 2:50 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Zhang, Helin; Wu, Jingjing
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: improve performance of vector
> > PMD
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:15:21AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > An analysis of the i40e code using Intel® VTune™ Amplifier 2016
> > > showed that the code was unexpectedly causing stalls due to "Loads
> > > blocked by Store Forwards". This can occur when a load from memory
> > > has to wait due to the prior store being to the same address, but
> > > being of a smaller size i.e. the stored value cannot be directly returned to
> the loader.
> > > [See ref: https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/544454]
> > >
> > > These stalls are due to the way in which the data_len values are
> > > handled in the driver. The lengths are extracted using vector
> > > operations, but those 16-bit lengths are then assigned using scalar
> > > operations i.e. 16-bit stores.
> > >
> > > These regular 16-bit stores actually have two effects in the code:
> > > * they cause the "Loads blocked by Store Forwards" issues reported
> > > * they also cause the previous loads in the RX function to actually
> > > be a load followed by a store to an address on the stack, because
> > > the 16-bit assignment can't be done to an xmm register.
> > >
> > > By converting the 16-bit stores operations into a sequence of SSE
> > > blend operations, we can ensure that the descriptor loads only occur
> > > once, and avoid both the additional store and loads from the stack,
> > > as well as the stalls due to the second loads being blocked.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> > >
> > Self-NAK on this version. The blend instruction used is SSE4.1 so
> > breaks the "default" build.
> >
> > Two obvious options to fix this:
> > 1. Keep the old code with SSE4.1 #ifdefs separating old and new 2.
> > Update the vpmd requirement to SSE4.1, and factor that in during
> > runtime select of the RX code path.
> >
> > Personally, I prefer the second option. Any objections?
> 
> +1 for second one.
> 
> >
> > /Bruce

I am using the "default" build when building in VM's, will both options work for me?

Regards,

Bernard.  


  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-14 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-14 10:15 Bruce Richardson
2016-04-14 13:50 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-04-14 14:00   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-04-14 15:33     ` Iremonger, Bernard [this message]
2016-04-14 16:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] improve i40e vpmd Bruce Richardson
2016-04-14 16:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] i40e: require SSE4.1 support for vector driver Bruce Richardson
2016-04-14 16:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] i40e: improve performance of vector PMD Bruce Richardson
2016-04-14 16:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] i40e: simplify SSE packet length extraction code Bruce Richardson
2016-04-17  8:32   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] improve i40e vpmd Zhe Tao
2016-04-27 16:30     ` Bruce Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C219FE8C29@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).