DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Iremonger, Bernard" <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
To: "Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>,
	"Xu, HuilongX" <huilongx.xu@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] about memzone name size issue
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 13:58:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C21A0133C6@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7DDD04DD-C43A-4402-8C4E-704D204ABF8C@intel.com>

Hi Huilong,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wiles, Keith
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 2:18 PM
> To: Xu, HuilongX <huilongx.xu@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] about memzone name size issue
> 
> >Hi all,
> >I find a issue on link_bonding unit test case.
> >
> >When I run model6 test case, will generate core dump error.
> >I debug it, find the error code in function:
> >rte_mempool_create_empty(const char *name, unsigned n, unsigned
> elt_size,
> >                unsigned cache_size, unsigned private_data_size,
> >                int socket_id, unsigned flags) {
> >          .......................
> >                ret = snprintf(mz_name, sizeof(mz_name),
> RTE_MEMPOOL_MZ_FORMAT, name);
> >                if (ret < 0 || ret >= (int)sizeof(mz_name)) {
> >                                rte_errno = ENAMETOOLONG;
> >                                goto exit_unlock;
> >                }
> >           .........................
> >}
> >The memzone name size only 32 bytes, but the mz_name in link_bonding is
> bigger 32 bytes. Could we set memzone name size to 64 bytes ?
> >Thanks  a lot
> 
> Having a name of 32 bytes is pretty big IMO, what would be a better reason
> for changing a internal structure as it will take two releases to make that
> change?
> How big is the name string you are passing into the routine?
> >
> 
> 
The following patches were submitted last Friday to fix this issue with the link bonding tests.

http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/13052/
http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/13053/

Regards,

Bernard.



  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-31 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-31 13:17 Wiles, Keith
2016-05-31 13:58 ` Iremonger, Bernard [this message]
2016-06-01  0:34   ` Xu, HuilongX
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-05-31  9:07 Xu, HuilongX

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C21A0133C6@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=huilongx.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=keith.wiles@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).