From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DEFB2A5E for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 18:00:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Dec 2016 09:00:13 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,310,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="14979683" Received: from irsmsx104.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.159]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Dec 2016 09:00:10 -0800 Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.159]) by IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.52]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 17:00:10 +0000 From: "Iremonger, Bernard" To: "Yigit, Ferruh" , "Lu, Wenzhuo" , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 26/32] app/testpmd: initialize receive mode for VMDq Thread-Index: AQHSUDqaLmbzT3/ulEa9Fo6n+6mKqaD8lo2AgAAfCkA= Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 17:00:09 +0000 Message-ID: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C224D05768@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1480637533-37425-1-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com> <1481081535-37448-1-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com> <1481081535-37448-27-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com> <1aa1ef1a-e823-8cc6-9b8f-06febdbd19ff@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1aa1ef1a-e823-8cc6-9b8f-06febdbd19ff@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiNTk3NTFiMjctZmFmNC00NWUzLWI4NmEtYmQ2ZGI0ZWIwMTMwIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE2LjIuMTEuMCIsIlRydXN0ZWRMYWJlbEhhc2giOiJhbVNHTDRDRmU2Y0Z2RklXdU9uYW4yd1hlcllZdWNxYTR2eGIrY0lsbUx3PSJ9 x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 26/32] app/testpmd: initialize receive mode for VMDq X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 17:00:15 -0000 Hi Ferruh, > -----Original Message----- > From: Yigit, Ferruh > Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2016 3:07 PM > To: Lu, Wenzhuo ; dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Iremonger, Bernard > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 26/32] app/testpmd: initialize receive > mode for VMDq >=20 > On 12/7/2016 3:32 AM, Wenzhuo Lu wrote: > > Initialise VMDq in the init_port_config function in a similar way to > > how it is done in the VMDq sample application. >=20 > What is the effect of doing existing initialization? This patch results in the function i40e_vmdq_setup() function being called = in i40e_ethdev.c at Line 1307: ret =3D i40e_vmdq_setup(dev); We are seeing unexpected side effects from this patch.=20 It will be dropped from the v3 of this patch set, pending further investiga= tion. Regards, Bernard.