From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E90055F36
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 18:01:04 +0200 (CEST)
X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message)
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48])
 by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
 24 Oct 2018 09:01:04 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,420,1534834800"; d="scan'208";a="100323526"
Received: from irsmsx106.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.31])
 by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2018 08:51:00 -0700
Received: from irsmsx156.ger.corp.intel.com (10.108.20.68) by
 IRSMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.3.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.319.2; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:50:59 +0100
Received: from irsmsx107.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.10.56]) by
 IRSMSX156.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.178]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002;
 Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:50:59 +0100
From: "Iremonger, Bernard" <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, "Wu, Jingjing"
 <jingjing.wu@intel.com>, "Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
CC: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "ophirmu@mellanox.com"
 <ophirmu@mellanox.com>, "wisamm@mellanox.com" <wisamm@mellanox.com>, "Yigit,
 Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, "arybchenko@solarflare.com"
 <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
Thread-Topic: [PATCH 3/5] app/testpmd: check not configuring port twice
Thread-Index: AQHUa59Ggt7YLMnMJkuoKtwzeoAg5aUuikYg
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 15:50:58 +0000
Message-ID: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C260D16FBF@IRSMSX107.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <20181024134111.26771-1-thomas@monjalon.net>
 <20181024134111.26771-4-thomas@monjalon.net>
In-Reply-To: <20181024134111.26771-4-thomas@monjalon.net>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiOTJlNzBiOWQtZDA3ZS00ZmMwLWFkZTUtODBjZDhkYmM2YjA2IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoibHVwMlNlM0lrVmIwNWJzdEpXSFRhUUxNWHY1dzJRZlY1Ukx2dElVNm5mcFBBXC9XdGN6TWZkdnBleGE1QkZiY2QifQ==
x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.0.400.15
dlp-reaction: no-action
x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/5] app/testpmd: check not configuring port
	twice
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:01:05 -0000

Hi Thomas,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 2:41 PM
> To: Iremonger, Bernard <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>; Wu, Jingjing
> <jingjing.wu@intel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; ophirmu@mellanox.com; wisamm@mellanox.com; Yigit,
> Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; arybchenko@solarflare.com
> Subject: [PATCH 3/5] app/testpmd: check not configuring port twice
>=20
> It is possible to request probing of a device twice, and possibly get new=
 ports for
> this device.

./devtools/check-git-log.sh -1
Wrong beginning of commit message:
        It is possible to request probing of a device twice,

> However, the ports which were already probed and setup must not be setup
> again. That's why it is checked whether the port is already part of fwd_p=
orts_ids
> array at the beginning of the function setup_attached_port().
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>

Otherwise

Acked-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>