From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB37A2EFC for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:54:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 397A11E951; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:54:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66ABE1E950 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:54:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Oct 2019 01:54:07 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.67,298,1566889200"; d="scan'208";a="396742224" Received: from irsmsx103.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.157]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Oct 2019 01:54:02 -0700 Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.131]) by IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.139]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:54:02 +0100 From: "Iremonger, Bernard" To: Akhil Goyal , Thomas Monjalon CC: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Ananyev, Konstantin" , "anoobj@marvell.com" , "jerinj@marvell.com" Thread-Topic: [PATCH v2 0/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: set default Thread-Index: AQHVeGt1dSqO/sYt5EmWNwDv6tYJ0KdVYHmAgAAtjwCABbfQAIAANSKQ Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 08:54:01 +0000 Message-ID: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C260E0E213@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1567069173-10505-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> <1569943080-20228-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> <5630388.AILYuOXkcA@xps> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiNmYyMzFkYmMtMDIxNC00MjM5LWI0MDAtZGJiOTM5ZTk3MTkyIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoiNXZ6Tzh4bjAyVng0YXN1XC9hYkhjRFwvczROS3hyUUR0ZW5cL0lvUjhQcWVEMGNTbWl0NXFSWWp1RlpqcUZzd1cwQiJ9 x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.2.0.6 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.180] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: set default X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Akhil, > -----Original Message----- > From: Akhil Goyal [mailto:akhil.goyal@nxp.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 7:43 AM > To: Thomas Monjalon > Cc: Iremonger, Bernard ; dev@dpdk.org; > Ananyev, Konstantin ; > anoobj@marvell.com; jerinj@marvell.com > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: set default >=20 >=20 > > > > 11/10/2019 14:40, Akhil Goyal: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > This patchset would need ack from more vendors as it will impact > > > user > > experience > > > on a key example application which is normally demonstrated to > customers. > > > > > > IPSec library is still evolving and there are new functionality > > > added every > > release. > > > Atleast from NXP side we are not OK with this change. > > > > What can be changed in the library to make it acceptable as a default > > in this example? > > >=20 > We are observing performance issues with ipsec library. So would request > other Vendors to confirm if they are OK with the performance numbers. Could you give some details on the performance issues you are seeing. Regards, Bernard.