From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3308A00BE; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 10:30:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70751BFA9; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 10:30:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2BF91BFA7 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 10:30:00 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Oct 2019 02:29:59 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,247,1569308400"; d="scan'208";a="193909706" Received: from irsmsx106.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.31]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Oct 2019 02:29:57 -0700 Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.131]) by IRSMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.8.185]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 09:29:57 +0000 From: "Iremonger, Bernard" To: Akhil Goyal , Thomas Monjalon CC: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Ananyev, Konstantin" , "anoobj@marvell.com" , "jerinj@marvell.com" Thread-Topic: [PATCH v2 0/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: set default Thread-Index: AQHVeGt1dSqO/sYt5EmWNwDv6tYJ0KdVYHmAgAAtjwCABbfQAIAANSKQgABXTICAF0WdAA== Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 09:29:56 +0000 Message-ID: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C260E14C88@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1567069173-10505-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> <1569943080-20228-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> <5630388.AILYuOXkcA@xps> <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C260E0E213@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiYjAwYzBhNWEtY2ZmYy00YzM5LWIyMDEtNThlOTQ2ZmViZDI4IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoiT2NSVk5WTlFzdkYzUW02eWlnWWp5SXZTcDBaK2gzZ0dtZUpuOTJJSW1GQmVnK0JqeXNHMjlldGxhdElvUG1XZyJ9 x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.2.0.6 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: set default X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Akhil, > -----Original Message----- > From: Akhil Goyal > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 4:05 PM > To: Iremonger, Bernard ; Thomas Monjalon > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ananyev, Konstantin ; > anoobj@marvell.com; jerinj@marvell.com > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: set default >=20 >=20 >=20 > > > > > > > > 11/10/2019 14:40, Akhil Goyal: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > > > This patchset would need ack from more vendors as it will impact > > > > > user > > > > experience > > > > > on a key example application which is normally demonstrated to > > > customers. > > > > > > > > > > IPSec library is still evolving and there are new functionality > > > > > added every > > > > release. > > > > > Atleast from NXP side we are not OK with this change. > > > > > > > > What can be changed in the library to make it acceptable as a > > > > default in this example? > > > > > > > > > > We are observing performance issues with ipsec library. So would > > > request other Vendors to confirm if they are OK with the performance > numbers. > > > > Could you give some details on the performance issues you are seeing. > > >=20 > We were observing about 4-5% drop when using the ipsec-lib instead of the > Legacy code path. We would again measure it on RC1. That is why I say, I = will > Hold this patch till RC2, unless some other vendor also confirms that. Is there any update on performance measurements on 19.11-rc1 ? Regards, Bernard.