From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85652A0C4E; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 03:51:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0879640143; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 03:51:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4135440140 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 03:51:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dggeme756-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.55]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4GdLZp4JRZzYdNh; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 09:51:30 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.103.128] (10.67.103.128) by dggeme756-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 09:51:33 +0800 From: "Min Hu (Connor)" To: Thomas Monjalon CC: , , , , Xiaoyun Li , Ajit Khaparde , References: <1615430867-29992-1-git-send-email-humin29@huawei.com> <2486158.ynNNe2h67z@thomas> <823a093d-c58b-997e-09dc-0d5f567e6452@huawei.com> <2509361.e6yffCRHIG@thomas> <92cc355e-11b4-ee4a-6bf1-b24ae3e97aa6@huawei.com> Message-ID: <8c19d53d-b41d-0248-ea67-1cdbf8109829@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 09:51:33 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <92cc355e-11b4-ee4a-6bf1-b24ae3e97aa6@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.103.128] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To dggeme756-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.102) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v16] app/testpmd: support multi-process X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 在 2021/7/26 15:28, Min Hu (Connor) 写道: > > > 在 2021/7/26 14:30, Thomas Monjalon 写道: >> 26/07/2021 02:26, Min Hu (Connor): >>> 在 2021/7/24 19:45, Thomas Monjalon 写道: >>>> 10/07/2021 05:50, Min Hu (Connor): >>>>> This patch adds multi-process support for testpmd. >>>>> For example the following commands run two testpmd >>>>> processes: >>>>> >>>>>    * the primary process: >>>>> >>>>> ./dpdk-testpmd --proc-type=auto -l 0-1 -- -i \ >>>>>      --rxq=4 --txq=4 --num-procs=2 --proc-id=0 >>>>> >>>>>    * the secondary process: >>>>> >>>>> ./dpdk-testpmd --proc-type=auto -l 2-3 -- -i \ >>>>>      --rxq=4 --txq=4 --num-procs=2 --proc-id=1 >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) >>>>> Signed-off-by: Lijun Ou >>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko >>>>> Acked-by: Xiaoyun Li >>>>> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde >>>>> Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit >>>>> --- >>>>> V16: >>>>> * revert unrelated changes. >>>>> * add some restrictions in doc. >>>> >>>> I didn't see clear agreement to integrate this feature in DPDK 21.08. >>>> >>>> BTW, the testpmd maintainer was not Cc'ed. >>>> >>> Hi, Thomas, >>> This patch has two "acked" and one "reviewed-by". >>> And Xiaoyun Li is the maintainer, I has already Cc'ed to him/her, >>> please check it out, thanks. >> >> Andrew's comment from v15: >> " >> IMHO, as I state above, current state is insufficient to >> consider is a start point to be applied. >> " > Hi, Andrew, Thomos, >     What is the least thing should be done for this patch to > meet the state sufficient to be applied? Hi, all, How about this patch, could it be applied? > >> >> >> . >> > .