DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/iavf: use write combining store for tail updates
@ 2021-05-12 10:28 Radu Nicolau
  2021-06-01 11:18 ` Zhang, Qi Z
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Radu Nicolau @ 2021-05-12 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev
  Cc: bruce.richardson, gordon.noonan, jingjing.wu, beilei.xing, Radu Nicolau

From: Gordon Noonan <gordon.noonan@intel.com>

Performance improvement: use a write combining store
instead of a regular mmio write to update queue tail
registers.

Signed-off-by: Gordon Noonan <gordon.noonan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com>
---
 drivers/common/iavf/iavf_osdep.h        | 5 +++++
 drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx.c            | 6 +++---
 drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_avx2.c   | 2 +-
 drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_avx512.c | 4 ++--
 drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_common.h | 2 +-
 drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_sse.c    | 4 ++--
 6 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/common/iavf/iavf_osdep.h b/drivers/common/iavf/iavf_osdep.h
index 76c186a5b..31d3d809f 100644
--- a/drivers/common/iavf/iavf_osdep.h
+++ b/drivers/common/iavf/iavf_osdep.h
@@ -132,6 +132,11 @@ writeq(uint64_t value, volatile void *addr)
 #define IAVF_PCI_REG_WRITE(reg, value)         writel(value, reg)
 #define IAVF_PCI_REG_WRITE_RELAXED(reg, value) writel_relaxed(value, reg)
 
+#define IAVF_PCI_REG_WC_WRITE(reg, value) \
+	rte_write32_wc((rte_cpu_to_le_32(value)), reg)
+#define IAVF_PCI_REG_WC_WRITE_RELAXED(reg, value) \
+	rte_write32_wc_relaxed((rte_cpu_to_le_32(value)), reg)
+
 #define IAVF_READ_REG(hw, reg)                 rd32(hw, reg)
 #define IAVF_WRITE_REG(hw, reg, value)         wr32(hw, reg, value)
 
diff --git a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx.c
index 87f7eebc6..85e3d133d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx.c
@@ -1161,7 +1161,7 @@ iavf_update_rx_tail(struct iavf_rx_queue *rxq, uint16_t nb_hold, uint16_t rx_id)
 			   rxq->port_id, rxq->queue_id, rx_id, nb_hold);
 		rx_id = (uint16_t)((rx_id == 0) ?
 			(rxq->nb_rx_desc - 1) : (rx_id - 1));
-		IAVF_PCI_REG_WRITE(rxq->qrx_tail, rx_id);
+		IAVF_PCI_REG_WC_WRITE(rxq->qrx_tail, rx_id);
 		nb_hold = 0;
 	}
 	rxq->nb_rx_hold = nb_hold;
@@ -1906,7 +1906,7 @@ iavf_rx_alloc_bufs(struct iavf_rx_queue *rxq)
 
 	/* Update rx tail register */
 	rte_wmb();
-	IAVF_PCI_REG_WRITE_RELAXED(rxq->qrx_tail, rxq->rx_free_trigger);
+	IAVF_PCI_REG_WC_WRITE_RELAXED(rxq->qrx_tail, rxq->rx_free_trigger);
 
 	rxq->rx_free_trigger =
 		(uint16_t)(rxq->rx_free_trigger + rxq->rx_free_thresh);
@@ -2327,7 +2327,7 @@ iavf_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts)
 	PMD_TX_LOG(DEBUG, "port_id=%u queue_id=%u tx_tail=%u nb_tx=%u",
 		   txq->port_id, txq->queue_id, tx_id, nb_tx);
 
-	IAVF_PCI_REG_WRITE_RELAXED(txq->qtx_tail, tx_id);
+	IAVF_PCI_REG_WC_WRITE_RELAXED(txq->qtx_tail, tx_id);
 	txq->tx_tail = tx_id;
 
 	return nb_tx;
diff --git a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_avx2.c b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_avx2.c
index f5646d645..475070e03 100644
--- a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_avx2.c
+++ b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_avx2.c
@@ -1500,7 +1500,7 @@ iavf_xmit_fixed_burst_vec_avx2(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
 
 	txq->tx_tail = tx_id;
 
-	IAVF_PCI_REG_WRITE(txq->qtx_tail, txq->tx_tail);
+	IAVF_PCI_REG_WC_WRITE(txq->qtx_tail, txq->tx_tail);
 
 	return nb_pkts;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_avx512.c b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_avx512.c
index d99de2a8b..571161c0c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_avx512.c
+++ b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_avx512.c
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ iavf_rxq_rearm(struct iavf_rx_queue *rxq)
 			   (rxq->nb_rx_desc - 1) : (rxq->rxrearm_start - 1));
 
 	/* Update the tail pointer on the NIC */
-	IAVF_PCI_REG_WRITE(rxq->qrx_tail, rx_id);
+	IAVF_PCI_REG_WC_WRITE(rxq->qrx_tail, rx_id);
 }
 
 #define IAVF_RX_LEN_MASK 0x80808080
@@ -1958,7 +1958,7 @@ iavf_xmit_fixed_burst_vec_avx512(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
 
 	txq->tx_tail = tx_id;
 
-	IAVF_PCI_REG_WRITE(txq->qtx_tail, txq->tx_tail);
+	IAVF_PCI_REG_WC_WRITE(txq->qtx_tail, txq->tx_tail);
 
 	return nb_pkts;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_common.h b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_common.h
index 6bb6903a8..457d6339e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_common.h
+++ b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_common.h
@@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ iavf_rxq_rearm_common(struct iavf_rx_queue *rxq, __rte_unused bool avx512)
 			     (rxq->nb_rx_desc - 1) : (rxq->rxrearm_start - 1));
 
 	/* Update the tail pointer on the NIC */
-	IAVF_PCI_REG_WRITE(rxq->qrx_tail, rx_id);
+	IAVF_PCI_REG_WC_WRITE(rxq->qrx_tail, rx_id);
 }
 #endif
 
diff --git a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_sse.c b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_sse.c
index ef1f17ea2..bf87696fa 100644
--- a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_sse.c
+++ b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_rxtx_vec_sse.c
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ iavf_rxq_rearm(struct iavf_rx_queue *rxq)
 		   rx_id, rxq->rxrearm_start, rxq->rxrearm_nb);
 
 	/* Update the tail pointer on the NIC */
-	IAVF_PCI_REG_WRITE(rxq->qrx_tail, rx_id);
+	IAVF_PCI_REG_WC_WRITE(rxq->qrx_tail, rx_id);
 }
 
 static inline void
@@ -1171,7 +1171,7 @@ iavf_xmit_fixed_burst_vec(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
 	PMD_TX_LOG(DEBUG, "port_id=%u queue_id=%u tx_tail=%u nb_pkts=%u",
 		   txq->port_id, txq->queue_id, tx_id, nb_pkts);
 
-	IAVF_PCI_REG_WRITE(txq->qtx_tail, txq->tx_tail);
+	IAVF_PCI_REG_WC_WRITE(txq->qtx_tail, txq->tx_tail);
 
 	return nb_pkts;
 }
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/iavf: use write combining store for tail updates
  2021-05-12 10:28 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/iavf: use write combining store for tail updates Radu Nicolau
@ 2021-06-01 11:18 ` Zhang, Qi Z
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Zhang, Qi Z @ 2021-06-01 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nicolau, Radu, dev
  Cc: Richardson, Bruce, Noonan, Gordon, Wu, Jingjing, Xing, Beilei,
	Nicolau, Radu



> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Radu Nicolau
> Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2021 6:29 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; Noonan, Gordon
> <gordon.noonan@intel.com>; Wu, Jingjing <jingjing.wu@intel.com>; Xing,
> Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Nicolau, Radu <radu.nicolau@intel.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/iavf: use write combining store for tail
> updates
> 
> From: Gordon Noonan <gordon.noonan@intel.com>
> 
> Performance improvement: use a write combining store instead of a regular
> mmio write to update queue tail registers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gordon Noonan <gordon.noonan@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com>

Acked-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>

Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel.

Thanks
Qi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-06-01 11:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-05-12 10:28 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/iavf: use write combining store for tail updates Radu Nicolau
2021-06-01 11:18 ` Zhang, Qi Z

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).