From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BDF82142 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:16:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFE0712B99; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 12:16:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.4.245] (vpn1-4-245.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.4.245]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u7NCGeE4013023 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:16:42 -0400 To: "Wang, Zhihong" <zhihong.wang@intel.com>, "'dev@dpdk.org'" <dev@dpdk.org>, "'yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com'" <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> References: <1471319402-112998-1-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com> <1471585430-125925-1-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com> <e6addeba-ffbc-baae-61c8-5b8e798c843e@redhat.com> <2a5320b9-c9dd-f7e3-e659-7d14cd1e5620@redhat.com> <8F6C2BD409508844A0EFC19955BE09411077348E@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> <8F6C2BD409508844A0EFC19955BE0941107747D9@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> Message-ID: <8e719d6a-5371-d4fc-f70e-6b36ca674c92@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:16:40 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8F6C2BD409508844A0EFC19955BE0941107747D9@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.23 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.30]); Tue, 23 Aug 2016 12:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] vhost: optimize enqueue X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 12:16:43 -0000 On 08/23/2016 12:43 PM, Wang, Zhihong wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Wang, Zhihong >> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 10:31 AM >> To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>; dev@dpdk.org >> Cc: yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com >> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 0/5] vhost: optimize enqueue >> >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coquelin@redhat.com] >>> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 6:02 PM >>> To: Wang, Zhihong <zhihong.wang@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org >>> Cc: yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] vhost: optimize enqueue .. >>>> >>> I forgot to add that before this series, I think we should first fix the windows >> bug. >>> Else we will need a dedicated fix for the stable branch. >> >> Okay I'll try to fix it, though I can't make any promises at present. >> >> Have tried once but stopped since we don't have enough debug info from the >> frontend side so basically I was debugging the backend based on guesses. > > Hi Maxime, Yuanhan, > > I've identified the root cause, do you think it makes sense to put the fix > in the same patch set? Or send it as a separated patch? Good work! Agree with Yuanhan, send it before the optimization series. Thanks, Maxime