From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE1E282 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 18:11:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Feb 2017 09:11:20 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,166,1484035200"; d="scan'208";a="225689785" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.137]) ([10.237.220.137]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Feb 2017 09:11:19 -0800 To: Jan Blunck , dev@dpdk.org References: <1487152929-23627-1-git-send-email-jblunck@infradead.org> Cc: shreyansh.jain@nxp.com From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: <8f5a40d8-04ce-9d56-4aa3-9825d71145e1@intel.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 17:11:19 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1487152929-23627-1-git-send-email-jblunck@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Rework vdev probing to use rte_bus infrastructure X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 17:11:22 -0000 On 2/15/2017 10:02 AM, Jan Blunck wrote: > With the rte_bus infrastructure present in 17.02 it is possible to refactor > the virtual device probing into a bus. This series also introduces the > rte_vdev_device to better keep track of devices. > > Jan Blunck (7): > eal: use different constructor priorities for initcalls > eal: probe legacy PCI devices before other bus devices > eal: move virtual device probing into a bus > eal: remove unused rte_eal_dev_init() > eal: Refactor vdev driver probe/remove > eal: add struct rte_vdev_device > eal: make virtual bus use rte_vdev_device It looks like this patchset depends [1], worth mentioning here. [1] http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/20416/ http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/20417/ Overall, after dependent patches get: Tested-by: Ferruh Yigit