[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: remove call to unlock

[Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>]

Coverity was complaining about not checking result of call to
fcntl() for unlocking the file. Disregarding the fact that error
value returned from fcntl() unlock call is highly unlikely in the
first place, we are subsequently calling close() on that same fd,
which will drop the lock, which makes call to fcntl() unnecessary.

Fix this by removing a call to fcntl() altogether.

Coverity issue: 272607

Fixes: 66cc45e293ed ("mem: replace memseg with memseg lists")
Cc: anatoly.burakov@intel.com

Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
---

Notes:
    v2:
    - Removed call to fcntl() instead of handling return value

 lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_hugepage_info.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_hugepage_info.c b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_hugepage_info.c
index db5aabd..485a89e 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_hugepage_info.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_hugepage_info.c
@@ -304,11 +304,8 @@ clear_hugedir(const char * hugedir)
 		lck_result = fcntl(fd, F_SETLK, &lck);
 
 		/* if lock succeeds, unlock and remove the file */
-		if (lck_result != -1) {
-			lck.l_type = F_UNLCK;
-			fcntl(fd, F_SETLK, &lck);
+		if (lck_result != -1)
 			unlinkat(dir_fd, dirent->d_name, 0);
-		}
 		close (fd);
 		dirent = readdir(dir);
 	}
-- 
2.7.4