From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B3EA0032; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 15:48:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1994641109; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 15:48:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0AB9400D4 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 15:48:40 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1657633720; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Oa16Q7Kz0DQAeDvVc1vCcvAXQaRQZfNWnFj0pQIp6ms=; b=KyZfoo3tahf6n0md6VQ29Lq6OhQNvEFbOOob95XXRkFTJugI/k6ZckUjV3EDyPCpmxpVjE 8+pZ8FWThSSgto5LbQ4QmcJiyN1h1Yq8DJJTvFZDPFmmZp6VGb7NSyLuEn8u5l5W81ETxA FUMsnaVsLFG/FZFk9J3D8V5whpred10= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-588-_v9LnX3PMi6LA51Fdak5zA-1; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 09:48:37 -0400 X-MC-Unique: _v9LnX3PMi6LA51Fdak5zA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 883378001EA; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 13:48:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.39.208.27] (unknown [10.39.208.27]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A6A5DCC485; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 13:48:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <9087aa5a-6ba8-5df2-8a68-63926843ff7e@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 15:48:32 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 To: Nicolas Chautru , dev@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net, gakhil@marvell.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, trix@redhat.com, "Vargas, Hernan" Cc: mdr@ashroe.eu, bruce.richardson@intel.com, david.marchand@redhat.com, stephen@networkplumber.org References: <1657238503-143836-1-git-send-email-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> From: Maxime Coquelin Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/10] baseband/acc200 In-Reply-To: <1657238503-143836-1-git-send-email-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.8 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Hi Nicolas, Hernan, (Adding Hernan in the recipients list) On 7/8/22 02:01, Nicolas Chautru wrote: > This is targeting 22.11 and includes the PMD for the > integrated accelerator on Intel Xeon SPR-EEC. > There is a dependency on that parallel serie still in-flight > which extends the bbdev api https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=23894 > > I will be offline for a few weeks for the summer break but > Hernan will cover for me during that time if required. > > Thanks > Nic > > Nicolas Chautru (10): > baseband/acc200: introduce PMD for ACC200 > baseband/acc200: add HW register definitions > baseband/acc200: add info get function > baseband/acc200: add queue configuration > baseband/acc200: add LDPC processing functions > baseband/acc200: add LTE processing functions > baseband/acc200: add support for FFT operations > baseband/acc200: support interrupt > baseband/acc200: add device status and vf2pf comms > baseband/acc200: add PF configure companion function > > MAINTAINERS | 3 + > app/test-bbdev/meson.build | 3 + > app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 76 + > doc/guides/bbdevs/acc200.rst | 244 ++ > doc/guides/bbdevs/index.rst | 1 + > drivers/baseband/acc200/acc200_pf_enum.h | 468 +++ > drivers/baseband/acc200/acc200_pmd.h | 690 ++++ > drivers/baseband/acc200/acc200_vf_enum.h | 89 + > drivers/baseband/acc200/meson.build | 8 + > drivers/baseband/acc200/rte_acc200_cfg.h | 115 + > drivers/baseband/acc200/rte_acc200_pmd.c | 5403 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/baseband/acc200/version.map | 10 + > drivers/baseband/meson.build | 1 + > 13 files changed, 7111 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 doc/guides/bbdevs/acc200.rst > create mode 100644 drivers/baseband/acc200/acc200_pf_enum.h > create mode 100644 drivers/baseband/acc200/acc200_pmd.h > create mode 100644 drivers/baseband/acc200/acc200_vf_enum.h > create mode 100644 drivers/baseband/acc200/meson.build > create mode 100644 drivers/baseband/acc200/rte_acc200_cfg.h > create mode 100644 drivers/baseband/acc200/rte_acc200_pmd.c > create mode 100644 drivers/baseband/acc200/version.map > Comparing ACC200 & ACC100 header files, I understand ACC200 is an evolution of the ACC10x family. The FEC bits are really close, ACC200 main addition seems to be FFT acceleration which could be handled in ACC10x driver based on device ID. I think both drivers have to be merged in order to avoid code duplication. That's how other families of devices (e.g. i40e) are handled. Thanks, Maxime