From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (xvm-189-124.dc0.ghst.net [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30AD1A09FF; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 23:18:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F28216083F; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 23:18:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12089160819 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 23:18:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D485C017E; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 17:18:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 05 Jan 2021 17:18:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= Qm8uv5SM/q5/SoEBPzZyk4yzs30MhcE0rF2dQsbayC0=; b=muQ6oZ8AI1Lmp5Fc XwwvcSfqhsVOpvnteatkX9yQW3kb1ysObG1lXI70j7GYVzYqMpoY+IKdu0lEP3p9 q6LHRr6i/+WrDGLhXYqRIYxFTcyuyIU2WfFkV6x61AlpKoRc3T7QvDq8D5P5aIxq aWAmgA8ehgEz+LCPTa8s0yXZ88w5T2RRaCIugA1wj/JdbCv9NhN7IX5cWU5VQUX2 h9kWapxgL9lnTWITjn8ra0By8vRC4Qb2goMrOxiwgraIGV2hzkjLGgNM/lyebYoF VTGTa0pAqc4bbay9LI8D7MS/xPMqDTjkEd4am8JnF93eBNs7dnVMQ47KQRQWyE/W nA797w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Qm8uv5SM/q5/SoEBPzZyk4yzs30MhcE0rF2dQsbay C0=; b=FDgIN2dyWlbsxE6yj+yjw+z3VE2kKBTak+4D7jv18I796IBrxxH2bBq6d TCGV4eZIsdAnV6bxwhkh3YYvzRGyOXUMLwmZ3lotAMmkUvOZREJ5j1VIlupqZktj BYTcR7PmfG0nQtpffgTIxsymnqSyos8g5mZl3RIS7fuWKFK+b+oSvtWQvacChYz2 /spbQ7zc/tz/rzE21ZuO45neynkdfsfKAUvDPiop47KJjkcZWma+nDXr+IEM+Hgd lLM34M/tKkrv685FYXdBAKS7DwL8EO5tHF8m/h0rq/hMkIYvcz7eE6bsPkRlVhJW lVgIR1bjxVWFKWFF8AGZdcAOgFfKw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrvdefjedguddvfecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdej ueeiiedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrh fuihiivgepudenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgr lhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 360FB108005F; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 17:18:47 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Alexander Kozyrev Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , Slava Ovsiienko , Ori Kam , "ferruh.yigit@intel.com" , "andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru" Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 23:18:46 +0100 Message-ID: <9148098.Iffu9yAPz8@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20201218013129.25186-1-akozyrev@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ethdev: introduce copy_field rte flow action X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 05/01/2021 23:12, Alexander Kozyrev: > Happy New Year Gentlemen, would you mind to share your thought on the proposed changes? > I was thinking about renaming it to more general "copy item" to cover all packet fields, tags and metadata. > Other than that it is ready for a formal patch integration in my opinion if there are no objections. Please advise. Our mails crossed, I've just replied to the RFC :) Yes we need to progress if we want to meet the deadline. More reviews may help.