From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDAFA0096 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 13:28:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF7331B9B7; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 13:28:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E584E1B9B7 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 13:28:34 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=530; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1559561315; x=1560770915; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=/zePQ7GSO/UlmPsDhVNNF8YO7IB0AUCrgO6t7nNAO34=; b=WFNaUqiqAzZxjpicc9LKcjy7h8U5NOqnDPvDK+FfVIozCE+rXdyxSK1X Eb59F0zEtz9dIXAHkZZD1tT7ZWWNnLRHr+qIfU4Sndwxmyi69+Q3qvzGd xAM8pHRBnjBLXIbA9AFgjPw2s42XlCQDXwsf84ZR4YMO9w0c6lJq44KtH o=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AFAAC2A/Vc/40NJK1mGgEBAQEBAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEHAgEBAQGBUQUBAQEBCwGCEIE+MCgKjCaMd5hdgXsJAQEBDAEBLwEBhEA?= =?us-ascii?q?Cgw8jNAkOAQMBAQQBAQIBBG0cDIVKAQEBAQM6PwwEAgEIEQQBAR8QMh0IAgQ?= =?us-ascii?q?OBQiFJapiiiqBNAGLWReBf4QjPoomBKh5CQIdgXCTKiOCEpRcox4CERWBMB8?= =?us-ascii?q?4gVhwFYMnghsXjUpWQTGQNIEhAQE?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,546,1549929600"; d="scan'208";a="281592136" Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 03 Jun 2019 11:28:33 +0000 Received: from XCH-ALN-016.cisco.com (xch-aln-016.cisco.com [173.36.7.26]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x53BSX61003689 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 3 Jun 2019 11:28:33 GMT Received: from xch-rcd-017.cisco.com (173.37.102.27) by XCH-ALN-016.cisco.com (173.36.7.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 06:28:33 -0500 Received: from xch-rcd-017.cisco.com ([173.37.102.27]) by XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com ([173.37.102.27]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.003; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 06:28:32 -0500 From: "Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" To: Ye Xiaolong CC: "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10] net/memif: introduce memory interface (memif) PMD Thread-Index: AQHVF3l+9NLZ4NQXw0WuoSH6GpUwZqaFLecAgASgG5A= Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 11:28:32 +0000 Message-ID: <9167c740527b4f008ae6a652d3aff84c@XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com> References: <20190520101841.17708-1-jgrajcia@cisco.com> <20190531062247.5952-1-jgrajcia@cisco.com> <20190531074320.GA44917@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20190531074320.GA44917@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.61.211.239] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.26, xch-aln-016.cisco.com X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-8.cisco.com Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10] net/memif: introduce memory interface (memif) PMD X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > -----Original Message----- > From: Ye Xiaolong > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 9:43 AM > To: Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10] net/memif: introduce memory interface > (memif) PMD >=20 > Minor nit, this should be a V1 instead of V10 after your RFC. I'll keep that in mind, but what version number should I use in the next pa= tch, since I did use V10 in this one? Thanks, Jakub