From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC5E62E8B for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 09:42:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Aug 2014 00:46:34 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,409,1406617200"; d="scan'208,217";a="590451155" Received: from fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.205]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Aug 2014 00:46:30 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx120.amr.corp.intel.com (10.19.9.29) by fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.205) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:46:29 -0700 Received: from shsmsx151.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.6.50) by fmsmsx120.amr.corp.intel.com (10.19.9.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:46:29 -0700 Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.219]) by SHSMSX151.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.174]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 15:46:28 +0800 From: "Ni, Xun" To: "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: is there any function like rte_mempool_destroy compare with rte_mempool_create Thread-Index: Ac/ByqswzBpVzwitQBiwuks8GFM9oA== Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 07:46:26 +0000 Message-ID: <91E2D863603AD4478F101CE81E76E45D01B5DFE8@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] is there any function like rte_mempool_destroy compare with rte_mempool_create X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 07:42:34 -0000 Hello, folks: I only see the rte_mempool_create but without function like rte_mempool_d= estroy? If I run an application twice, is there possible that the app has t= he memory leak? Or it just doesn't have enough memory to execute it again b= ecause the first one already get most of the memory but without release it. Thanks, Xun