* [dpdk-dev] [Bug 106] running dpdk-procinfo or any secondary leading to system memory exhaustion
@ 2018-11-12 10:44 bugzilla
2018-11-12 19:31 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2018-11-13 17:03 ` bugzilla
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla @ 2018-11-12 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106
Bug ID: 106
Summary: running dpdk-procinfo or any secondary leading to
system memory exhaustion
Product: DPDK
Version: 18.05
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: CONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: Normal
Component: core
Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
Reporter: vipin.varghese@intel.com
Target Milestone: ---
Issue: Running dpdk secondary instance in multiple iterations leads to memory
exhaustion
Environment: Host & Virtual Machine
Primary App: DPDK l2fwd
Secondary App: simplified custom app
File:
Secondary:
int
main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int ret;
int i;
char c_flag[] = "-c1";
char n_flag[] = "-n4";
char mp_flag[] = "--proc-type=secondary";
char *argp[argc + 3];
uint16_t nb_ports;
argp[0] = argv[0];
argp[1] = c_flag;
argp[2] = n_flag;
argp[3] = mp_flag;
for (i = 1; i < argc; i++)
argp[i + 3] = argv[i];
argc += 3;
ret = rte_eal_init(argc, argp);
if (ret < 0) {
ret = rte_eal_cleanup();
if (ret)
printf("Error from rte_eal_cleanup(), %d\n", ret);
rte_panic("Cannot init EAL\n");
}
ret = rte_eal_cleanup();
if (ret)
printf("Error from rte_eal_cleanup(), %d\n", ret);
fflush(stdout);
fflush(stderr);
return 0;
}
Run script:
#!/bin/sh
./build/app/test
ret=$?
while [ $ret -eq 0 ]
do
sync; echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
./build/app/test
ret=$?
echo "ret ---------------- $ret"
done
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [Bug 106] running dpdk-procinfo or any secondary leading to system memory exhaustion
2018-11-12 10:44 [dpdk-dev] [Bug 106] running dpdk-procinfo or any secondary leading to system memory exhaustion bugzilla
@ 2018-11-12 19:31 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2018-11-13 17:03 ` bugzilla
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mattias Rönnblom @ 2018-11-12 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bugzilla, dev; +Cc: vipin.varghese
On 2018-11-12 11:44, bugzilla@dpdk.org wrote:
> https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106
>
> Bug ID: 106
> Summary: running dpdk-procinfo or any secondary leading to
> system memory exhaustion
> Product: DPDK
> Version: 18.05
> Hardware: x86
> OS: Linux
> Status: CONFIRMED
> Severity: critical
> Priority: Normal
> Component: core
> Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
> Reporter: vipin.varghese@intel.com
> Target Milestone: ---
>
> Issue: Running dpdk secondary instance in multiple iterations leads to memory
> exhaustion
>
Exhaustion, meaning the kernel eventually - given enough iterations of
the test program - invoke the OOM handler (i.e. crash)?
>
> Run script:
> #!/bin/sh
>
> ./build/app/test
> ret=$?
>
> while [ $ret -eq 0 ]
> do
> sync; echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> ./build/app/test
> ret=$?
> echo "ret ---------------- $ret"
> done
>
An application causing the kernel to cache more pages wouldn't normally
be considered to be leaking memory, if those pages are not dirty. If
"echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches" frees the memory "leaked", it wasn't
leaked. That holds true even for system with swapping enabled.
You can't use MemFree (in /proc/meminfo) or similar as an indication how
much memory is actually available to applications, would they need it.
Pages that "echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches" frees, would also be free
would the system come under memory pressure. A drop in MemAvailable is a
better indication of applications' using more memory.
find $HOME -type f | xargs cat >/dev/null
For example, find+cat above aren't leaking memory, even if the pipeline
likely causes MemFree to go down.
Anyway. If the answer to my first question is "the kernel crashes", you
can ignore all this.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [Bug 106] running dpdk-procinfo or any secondary leading to system memory exhaustion
2018-11-12 10:44 [dpdk-dev] [Bug 106] running dpdk-procinfo or any secondary leading to system memory exhaustion bugzilla
2018-11-12 19:31 ` Mattias Rönnblom
@ 2018-11-13 17:03 ` bugzilla
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla @ 2018-11-13 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106
Vipin Varghese (vipin.varghese@intel.com) changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #13 from Vipin Varghese (vipin.varghese@intel.com) ---
Thanks Anatoly, this fixed tmpfs filling up. we ran this for almost 2 hours the
memory is normal.
tested on x86_64 Linux platform
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-11-13 17:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-11-12 10:44 [dpdk-dev] [Bug 106] running dpdk-procinfo or any secondary leading to system memory exhaustion bugzilla
2018-11-12 19:31 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2018-11-13 17:03 ` bugzilla
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).