From: Iain Barker <iain.barker@oracle.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] VLAN tags always stripped on i40evf [VMware SR-IOV]
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 06:19:41 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <93359c04-0da3-4f3c-ba56-799817775781@default> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6a275bea-214e-489b-ba42-df70328b3854@default>
On Tuesday, October 10, 2017 9:49 AM (EST), Iain Barker wrote:
> I have a problem trying to get VLAN tagged frames to be received at the i40evf PMD.
With more debugging enabled, I can see that this seems to be a compatibility problem between DPDK and i40evf related to VLAN hardware stripping.
Specifically, when DPDK requests VLAN stripping to be disabled by VF, but the PF policy doesn't allow it to be disabled (as is the case for VMware SR-IOV), an error is returned from the API.
testpmd> vlan set strip off 0
i40evf_execute_vf_cmd(): No response for 28
i40evf_disable_vlan_strip(): Failed to execute command of VIRTCHNL_OP_DISABLE_VLAN_STRIPPING
In that case, received frames with VLAN headers will still be stripped at the PF, and the TCI will record the missing VLAN details when handed up to the DPDK driver.
With i40e debug enabled, it's clear to see the difference being reported in i40e_rxd_to_vlan_tci:
Example using VLAN on i40e PCI (vlan works):
PMD: i40e_rxd_to_vlan_tci(): Mbuf vlan_tci: 0, vlan_tci_outer: 0
Port 0 pkt-len=102 nb-segs=1
ETH: src=00:10:E0:8D:A7:52 dst=00:10:E0:8A:86:8A [vlan id=8] type=0x0800
IPV4: src=8.8.8.102 dst=8.8.8.3 proto=1 (ICMP)
ICMP: echo request seq id=1
Example using VLAN on i40evf SR-IOV (vlan fails):
PMD: i40e_rxd_to_vlan_tci(): Mbuf vlan_tci: 8, vlan_tci_outer: 0
Port 0 pkt-len=60 nb-segs=1
ETH: src=00:10:E0:8D:A7:52 dst=FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF type=0x0806
ARP: hrd=1 proto=0x0800 hln=6 pln=4 op=1 (ARP Request)
sha=00:10:E0:8D:A7:52 sip=8.8.8.102
tha=00:00:00:00:00:00 tip=8.8.8.3
As the application requested tagging not be stripped, and the hardware driver was not able to disable strip, in my opinion DPDK should emulate the requested behavior by re-add the missing VLAN header in the RX thread, before it passes the mbuf to the application. I'm guessing that the native Linux driver is smart enough to do something like this automatically in software, but DPDK does not...
Adding a call to rte_vlan_insert() to reinstate the VLAN header using the data from TCI is sufficient to avoid the problem in a quick test.
--- drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c.orig 2016-11-30 04:28:48.000000000 -0500
+++ drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c 2017-10-10 15:07:10.851398087 -0400
@@ -93,6 +93,8 @@
rte_le_to_cpu_16(rxdp->wb.qword0.lo_dword.l2tag1);
PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG, "Descriptor l2tag1: %u",
rte_le_to_cpu_16(rxdp->wb.qword0.lo_dword.l2tag1));
+ // vlan got stripped. Re-inject vlan from tci
+ rte_vlan_insert(&mb);
} else {
mb->vlan_tci = 0;
}
For a proper solution, this would need to be made selective based on whether the port config originally asked for VLANs to be stripped or not. But I'm not sure that rte_vlan_insert() has enough context to be able to access that data, as it's stored in the driver/hw struct not the rx buffer.
Obviously the same would be required in the vector rxtx and similar data paths for other drivers, if affected by the same shortcoming. I don't have other combinations available that I could test with, and I guess VMware i40evf SR-IOV VLAN isn't part of the DPDK release test suite either.
cc: dev@dpdk.org for comment as this is getting beyond my level of knowledge as a DPDK user
thanks,
Iain
next parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-11 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <6a275bea-214e-489b-ba42-df70328b3854@default>
2017-10-11 13:19 ` Iain Barker [this message]
2017-10-27 2:23 ` Xing, Beilei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=93359c04-0da3-4f3c-ba56-799817775781@default \
--to=iain.barker@oracle.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=users@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).