From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (mail-wm0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30CE68E7F for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 19:01:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id i204so96837221wma.0 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 07 Sep 2016 10:01:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6zwv+wPLsedaTPZVsVTgNKyAC4ozN1cXcNmkaSwSGDk=; b=uA2AdtCIFI0fje04Npe88pk7ASPb1g3DDvYKyZVyZhMjpu68rsn+a8j8q4ug2oj7Ne Oelm3UJ7uDwgd8b0DDU+8i1IE+rGuSRgIqad6M8NWZadsuE7JrnzTuvM0Do4nhQMjs0m CgrJ1WmsyK+guTmNnaFkp1XeWCfJL5eiKghPy7joFKjpQhShzJzPMNwap8QEiOFCO2X9 TrJYGUqfy0F25IhbaL+gDGkevPi0okYjCzXpqKm2/abcO70djM64GfUkg3GGHq4eaeWc WTLCUeABppLxTgZYa8MpKoLhpKCO2mmAAns9PvVhdjbQuhdS+1Y4epGV0UGY+XJ72fp7 iZqw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6zwv+wPLsedaTPZVsVTgNKyAC4ozN1cXcNmkaSwSGDk=; b=ag1uYlK37d4kA2Qd2cFjp1QQfbyCMH4CHwIoLQUOafo//fHm0TOl93GPkSV9+3NOxl rTOuGJiQeoJGABPUcyTa4/9k7mSG6h1D+1QddRkUSAkpld8xW0HOANGzoWAZNOJea2A9 OI54hpdL1uQ9gx8GxOsXjxOICAPWEeuDJ8ZGpLFoTf2pfs/3oStI/h67Os4BUC1RSWMm L76CYk06Tg/66nwYj6p2y7RFv2gT2k47m0B+8WKfAuHhYOER6ZEZHPEhmJawlBh/IMfk 8TFpHyUaGFutj3bQ0U/ddLZE0Xjcop3iV+Y8vd/giGJRwEBkDURJ1Jzhp8lMF5c1VshG RAKA== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNVgGmxjlIPX4EKYBXUQn/QX1y2kX8TUnTNr02epZHdRdYJGc0hX7uVJyKRuTwRryI2 X-Received: by 10.28.131.208 with SMTP id f199mr4686233wmd.116.1473267708858; Wed, 07 Sep 2016 10:01:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t202sm5119862wmt.22.2016.09.07.10.01.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 07 Sep 2016 10:01:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> To: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>, Stephen Finucane <stephenfinucane@hotmail.com> Cc: dev@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 19:01:47 +0200 Message-ID: <9398822.xtO6cvAGR1@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D8973C9D5C64@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1736050.3Z5tnqk6B6@xps13> <E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D8973C9D5C64@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK patchwork upgrade X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 17:01:49 -0000 2016-09-07 16:40, De Lara Guarch, Pablo: > I am looking at it, and I see two issues: > - There are some patches that have been acked, but I don't see that in patchwork > (e.g. http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/15381/) Yes the new columns are empty. I guess they will be filled starting from now. Stephen, could we re-parse old emails (from August/September) to fill A/R/T without breaking the database? > - Is there any way to see if patches in a patchset have been acked? > Usually, patchsets are acked by replying to the cover letter, > but this is not going to be reflected in Patchwork, correct? Yes, I think the next version of patchwork will support series and cover letter parsing. Maybe we could also be able to check the message id of a previous cover letter before sending a new version of a series?