From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A64A10DA for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 11:36:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7F41BF7C; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 11:36:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com (dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com [67.231.154.164]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D4C1BF57 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 11:36:14 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Proofpoint Essentials engine Received: from webmail.solarflare.com (uk.solarflare.com [193.34.186.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1-us4.ppe-hosted.com (PPE Hosted ESMTP Server) with ESMTPS id 12DF814005C; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 09:36:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (85.187.13.152) by ukex01.SolarFlarecom.com (10.17.10.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 10:36:05 +0100 To: Thomas Monjalon , Ajit Khaparde , Somnath Kotur , Beilei Xing , Qi Zhang , Wenzhuo Lu , Konstantin Ananyev CC: References: <20190730155948.26631-1-thomas@monjalon.net> From: Andrew Rybchenko Message-ID: <93bd9d93-ab38-52ac-5486-3735142be67e@solarflare.com> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:36:00 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190730155948.26631-1-thomas@monjalon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [85.187.13.152] X-ClientProxiedBy: ocex03.SolarFlarecom.com (10.20.40.36) To ukex01.SolarFlarecom.com (10.17.10.4) X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-12.5.0.1300-8.5.1010-24812.003 X-TM-AS-Result: No-0.485500-8.000000-10 X-TMASE-MatchedRID: sDm3xtR6Ud/mLzc6AOD8DfHkpkyUphL9IRYz7VrF56fHkH7uosEn7Mwe rJ+hsObRaLbVdp/TjCSRk6XtYogiau9c69BWUTGw0C1sQRfQzEHEQdG7H66TyHEqm8QYBtMOCGh b4XVpMfLVeg/E6cp3u8ai5dHKY0xuppiZHBx4+B/i+fTMx9KaNitss6PUa4/cD6GAt+UbooSj1C O4X0EqeXggXFAhtWiYlExlQIQeRG0= X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No X-TMASE-Result: 10--0.485500-8.000000 X-TMASE-Version: SMEX-12.5.0.1300-8.5.1010-24812.003 X-MDID: 1564565773-ilOiMYlbTZFh Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] drivers/net: deprecate private API for VF ports X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 7/30/19 6:59 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Since the concept of representors was introduced, > we do not need any specific API for VF ports. > Any VF port should be able to be configured through > its representor port in a more generic fashion. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko