DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>
To: "Di, ChenxuX" <chenxux.di@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Yang, Qiming" <qiming.yang@intel.com>,
	"Di, ChenxuX" <chenxux.di@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/5] net/i40e: cleanup Tx buffers
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 08:24:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <94479800C636CB44BD422CB454846E013CEB33E6@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191224023906.60789-3-chenxux.di@intel.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Chenxu Di
> Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2019 10:39 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Yang, Qiming <qiming.yang@intel.com>; Di, ChenxuX
> <chenxux.di@intel.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/5] net/i40e: cleanup Tx buffers
> 
> Add support to the i40e driver for the API rte_eth_tx_done_cleanup to force
> free consumed buffers on Tx ring.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chenxu Di <chenxux.di@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c    |   1 +
>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c |   1 +
>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c      | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h      |   1 +
>  4 files changed, 125 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> index 5999c964b..fad47a942 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> @@ -522,6 +522,7 @@ static const struct eth_dev_ops i40e_eth_dev_ops = {
>  	.mac_addr_set                 = i40e_set_default_mac_addr,
>  	.mtu_set                      = i40e_dev_mtu_set,
>  	.tm_ops_get                   = i40e_tm_ops_get,
> +	.tx_done_cleanup              = i40e_tx_done_cleanup,
>  };
> 
>  /* store statistics names and its offset in stats structure */ diff --git
> a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> index 5dba0928b..0ca5417d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> @@ -215,6 +215,7 @@ static const struct eth_dev_ops i40evf_eth_dev_ops = {
>  	.rss_hash_conf_get    = i40evf_dev_rss_hash_conf_get,
>  	.mtu_set              = i40evf_dev_mtu_set,
>  	.mac_addr_set         = i40evf_set_default_mac_addr,
> +	.tx_done_cleanup      = i40e_tx_done_cleanup,
>  };
> 
>  /*
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c index
> 17dc8c78f..e75733b8e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> @@ -2455,6 +2455,128 @@ i40e_tx_queue_release_mbufs(struct
> i40e_tx_queue *txq)
>  	}
>  }
> 
> +int i40e_tx_done_cleanup(void *q, uint32_t free_cnt) {
> +	struct i40e_tx_queue *txq = (struct i40e_tx_queue *)q;
> +	struct i40e_tx_entry *sw_ring;
> +	volatile struct i40e_tx_desc *txr;
> +	uint16_t tx_first; /* First segment analyzed. */
> +	uint16_t tx_id;    /* Current segment being processed. */
> +	uint16_t tx_last;  /* Last segment in the current packet. */
> +	uint16_t tx_next;  /* First segment of the next packet. */
> +	int count;
> +
> +	if (txq == NULL)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	count = 0;
> +	sw_ring = txq->sw_ring;
> +	txr = txq->tx_ring;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * tx_tail is the last sent packet on the sw_ring. Goto the end
> +	 * of that packet (the last segment in the packet chain) and
> +	 * then the next segment will be the start of the oldest segment
> +	 * in the sw_ring. This is the first packet that will be
> +	 * attempted to be freed.
> +	 */
> +
> +	/* Get last segment in most recently added packet. */
> +	tx_first = sw_ring[txq->tx_tail].last_id;

Should be tx_last more readable here? And then tx_first = sw_ring[tx_last].next_id?

> +
> +	/* Get the next segment, which is the oldest segment in ring. */
> +	tx_first = sw_ring[tx_first].next_id;
> +
> +	/* Set the current index to the first. */
> +	tx_id = tx_first;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Loop through each packet. For each packet, verify that an
> +	 * mbuf exists and that the last segment is free. If so, free
> +	 * it and move on.
> +	 */
> +	while (1) {
> +		tx_last = sw_ring[tx_id].last_id;
> +
> +		if (sw_ring[tx_last].mbuf) {
> +			if ((txr[tx_last].cmd_type_offset_bsz &
> +
> 	rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TXD_QW1_DTYPE_MASK)) !=

Is the logic reversed? '!=' means the mbuf is still in use.

> +
> 	rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TX_DESC_DTYPE_DESC_DONE)) {
> +				/*
> +				 * Increment the number of packets
> +				 * freed.
> +				 */
> +				count++;

Should 'count++' be after free mbuf?

> +
> +				/* Get the start of the next packet. */
> +				tx_next = sw_ring[tx_last].next_id;
> +
> +				/*
> +				 * Loop through all segments in a
> +				 * packet.
> +				 */
> +				do {
> +
> 	rte_pktmbuf_free_seg(sw_ring[tx_id].mbuf);
> +					sw_ring[tx_id].mbuf = NULL;
> +					sw_ring[tx_id].last_id = tx_id;
> +
> +					/* Move to next segemnt. */

Typo: segemnt -> segment

> +					tx_id = sw_ring[tx_id].next_id;
> +
> +				} while (tx_id != tx_next);
> +
> +				if (unlikely(count == (int)free_cnt))
> +					break;
> +			} else {
> +				/*
> +				 * mbuf still in use, nothing left to
> +				 * free.
> +				 */
> +				break;
> +			}
> +		} else {
> +			/*
> +			 * There are multiple reasons to be here:
> +			 * 1) All the packets on the ring have been
> +			 *    freed - tx_id is equal to tx_first
> +			 *    and some packets have been freed.
> +			 *    - Done, exit
> +			 * 2) Interfaces has not sent a rings worth of
> +			 *    packets yet, so the segment after tail is
> +			 *    still empty. Or a previous call to this
> +			 *    function freed some of the segments but
> +			 *    not all so there is a hole in the list.
> +			 *    Hopefully this is a rare case.
> +			 *    - Walk the list and find the next mbuf. If
> +			 *      there isn't one, then done.
> +			 */
> +			if (likely(tx_id == tx_first && count != 0))
> +				break;
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * Walk the list and find the next mbuf, if any.
> +			 */
> +			do {
> +				/* Move to next segemnt. */

Typo: segemnt -> segment

> +				tx_id = sw_ring[tx_id].next_id;
> +
> +				if (sw_ring[tx_id].mbuf)
> +					break;
> +
> +			} while (tx_id != tx_first);
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * Determine why previous loop bailed. If there
> +			 * is not an mbuf, done.
> +			 */
> +			if (sw_ring[tx_id].mbuf == NULL)
> +				break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return count;
> +}
> +
>  void
>  i40e_reset_tx_queue(struct i40e_tx_queue *txq)  { diff --git
> a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h index
> 2106bb355..8f11f011a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h
> @@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ void i40e_dev_free_queues(struct rte_eth_dev *dev);
> void i40e_reset_rx_queue(struct i40e_rx_queue *rxq);  void
> i40e_reset_tx_queue(struct i40e_tx_queue *txq);  void
> i40e_tx_queue_release_mbufs(struct i40e_tx_queue *txq);
> +int i40e_tx_done_cleanup(void *txq, uint32_t free_cnt);
>  int i40e_alloc_rx_queue_mbufs(struct i40e_rx_queue *rxq);  void
> i40e_rx_queue_release_mbufs(struct i40e_rx_queue *rxq);
> 
> --
> 2.17.1


  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-26  8:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-03  5:51 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-03  5:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] net/fm10k: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-03  5:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-03  5:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-03  5:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] net/fm10k: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/5] net/fm10k: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/5] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/5] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/5] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-24  2:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/5] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-24  2:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/5] net/fm10k: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-24  2:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/5] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-26  8:24     ` Xing, Beilei [this message]
2019-12-24  2:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/5] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-24  2:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/5] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-24  2:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/5] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-30  9:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/4] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-30  9:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/4] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-30 13:01     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-12-30  9:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/4] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-30  9:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-30 12:53     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-03  9:01       ` Di, ChenxuX
2020-01-05 23:36         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-06  9:03           ` Di, ChenxuX
2020-01-06 13:26             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-07 10:46               ` Di, ChenxuX
2020-01-07 14:09                 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-08 10:15                   ` Di, ChenxuX
2020-01-08 15:12                     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-12-30  9:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/4] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-09 10:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/4] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-09 10:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/4] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-09 10:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/4] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-09 10:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-09 14:01     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-10 10:08       ` Di, ChenxuX
2020-01-10 12:46         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-09 10:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/4] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-10  9:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/4] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-10  9:58   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/4] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-10  9:58   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/4] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-10  9:58   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-10 13:49     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-10  9:59   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 4/4] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-13  9:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/4] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-13  9:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/4] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-13 11:08     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-13  9:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/4] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-14  1:55     ` Yang, Qiming
2020-01-14 12:40     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-15 14:34       ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-16  1:40         ` Di, ChenxuX
2020-01-16  7:09           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice: cleanup for vec path check Xiaolong Ye
2020-01-16 10:19             ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-17  2:21             ` Yang, Qiming
2020-01-16  8:43     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/4] net/ice: cleanup Tx buffers Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-13  9:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-13 11:07     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-16  8:44     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-16 14:47     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-16 15:23       ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-13  9:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 4/4] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-13 11:08     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-14  2:49     ` Ye Xiaolong
2020-01-14  2:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] drivers/net: " Ye Xiaolong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=94479800C636CB44BD422CB454846E013CEB33E6@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=chenxux.di@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).