From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACC1EA0471 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 03:43:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59051BE87; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 03:43:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qk1-f196.google.com (mail-qk1-f196.google.com [209.85.222.196]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15671BE86; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 03:43:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qk1-f196.google.com with SMTP id d79so81254398qke.11; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 18:43:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DLN7SEv16oc2VOzXM5RL/7r8egi+XkJntHL+IlX02mk=; b=sGS7wAp63Xzd6fpaudqIVYHcTL3qeMXfnmLbCWxovIXYcKFXgq8GK+crB6ELj8tre3 c0t+239QgqFRNV7Gc7BQFqUaQrW2ilKy0YRDcNsPNU7XjrDevMlrayxeR0D2fqBBxHsh BfZue4LFka360qRa3JXGQbGPr4nNmlWIKEBWqMnQ9mclyPLmzLs0ZLAWZjtc5xD5YU4L KYljyahEFno+7dfrDWFjH+xVKfv6dME33PvPP5RWy5MnD6dAdAJ5O0tOxEXeeHP/QniV KflSBM+Z1dCriPKoUSnzDNxrxxmQ4qUfUgK9kHMfhMOL6cNagOV6BSRmPslL9LIHCRAL 4i0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DLN7SEv16oc2VOzXM5RL/7r8egi+XkJntHL+IlX02mk=; b=kbZISzIdJJ5ZvV8ib7hkO4XV8i9nRbE5sX9E9LGBxWkPWp+o44w7Jgg92D8O9q5GzA zwNEWSaHAZFscckOQNA9lYB+xl7+WCkSpNeD2VnarumsJjANlMmsjsGuH1br704u/PZQ 8UVB7M1YSVWnzxcSpPb1d1TUI5hNvvJKAdegI2OPWNpmm++J0ZAwcm7tHW9mOxKHwNyR zBni9WxCd8mHc+2NcbA1yNPI49UWtO+/DZC3ZrL/c7Ahv4U1lE6E0hMHSfFE6DdvtuaA LjJdLiMXCjB1/PFUBw2MRpKTxFbeVcJoXh9V7+WHzxgNxc5TH7dX3YGFYyQCywfmV2HS DNzw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXGUiBYIAvatrj7bdSE6/wb+I7zeGmbCEOe68rQ5nFxZ3WaiDH6 oWAsGNXQXaRPdMxgbgeQ2llao7hbQ8I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyVCG0mWml9PqQlMNfc+sxPqnvjyIPTXx98Rze5SDkWiglnbFPgn35z6dJGlH0c1t9Z9SoBNw== X-Received: by 2002:a37:a292:: with SMTP id l140mr35488709qke.496.1565747009545; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 18:43:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (pool-96-255-60-31.washdc.fios.verizon.net. [96.255.60.31]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c11sm8392185qtq.41.2019.08.13.18.43.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 13 Aug 2019 18:43:28 -0700 (PDT) To: Ferruh Yigit , David Marchand Cc: dev , =?UTF-8?Q?Przemys=c5=82aw_O=c5=82tarzewski?= , dpdk stable References: <1554900829-16180-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@redhat.com> <1554900829-16180-3-git-send-email-david.marchand@redhat.com> <9a4fa115-0f92-9686-ae89-0f1427ab6d29@gmail.com> <0f8dc043-cd47-d677-872a-54fbd4477f64@gmail.com> From: Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com> Message-ID: <9487dc50-ed43-ff14-9c2a-6931fc1c52a6@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 21:43:27 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] net/bonding: fix LACP fast queue Rx handler X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 7/2/19 11:01 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 5/16/2019 10:12 AM, David Marchand wrote: >> Hello Chas, >> >> On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:50 AM Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 4/18/19 3:11 AM, David Marchand wrote: >>>> Hello Chas, >>>> >>>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 4:02 PM Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>> I should have some time this weekend to run these patches through our >>>> regression system. >>>> >>>> >>>> Did you manage to run this series through your tests system ? >>> >>> There were some other issues over the weekend. Hopefully this one. >>> >> >> >> Any update ? >> Thanks. >> > > Reminder of this patchset, if there is no objection in next a few days I will > merge them. > > Thanks, > ferruh > OK, I was able to get a clean run for these patches through our regression system. I didn't see any failures with these patches applied. Consider the following: David Marchand (4): net/bonding: fix oob access in LACP mode when sending many packets net/bonding: fix LACP fast queue Rx handler net/bonding: fix unicast packets filtering when not in promisc net/bonding: prefer allmulti to promisc for LACP Signed-off-by: Chas Williams Sorry this took so long!