DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rao, Nikhil" <nikhil.rao@intel.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: thomas@monjalon.net, nikhil.rao@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] check-symbol-change: relax rule for identifying a section
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 08:33:53 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <954d81fa-e977-ac7e-8c5f-fbe2fd186bf4@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180816110801.5378-1-nhorman@tuxdriver.com>

On 8/16/2018 4:38 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> It was reported recently that some patches that add symbols to an
> existing EXPERIMENTAL section of a version map file generate errors
> because the check-symbol-change script was identifying the section as
> "@@" rather than EXPERIMENTAL.  This was fairly clearly due to the fact
> that the rule identifying the version section expected the whole section
> to be added, rather than having it already exist, with only new symbols
> being added to the existing section. This led the match rule to misread
> the format of that line and pull the wrong word out of it.
> 
> The fix is to relax the rule slightly.  Rather than assume that the
> section must exist on a line that was added, allow the section name to
> be set by any line that ends in a '{', which should be correct, given
> our coding practices.  The section name is then extracted as the next to
> the last word on the line ( $(NF-1) ).
> 
> Tested by the reporter with good results
> 
> Reported-by: nikhil.rao@intel.com
> Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
> CC: thomas@monjalon.net
> CC: nikhil.rao@intel.com
> ---
>   devtools/check-symbol-change.sh | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh b/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh
> index daaf45e14..cf9cfc745 100755
> --- a/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh
> +++ b/devtools/check-symbol-change.sh
> @@ -25,14 +25,14 @@ build_map_changes()
>   		# supresses the subordonate rules below
>   		/[-+] a\/.*\.^(map)/ {in_map=0}
>   
> -		# Triggering this rule, which starts a line with a + and ends it
> +		# Triggering this rule, which starts a line and ends it
>   		# with a { identifies a versioned section.  The section name is
>   		# the rest of the line with the + and { symbols remvoed.
>   		# Triggering this rule sets in_sec to 1, which actives the
>   		# symbol rule below
> -		/+.*{/ {gsub("+","");
> +		/^.*{/ {
>   			if (in_map == 1) {
> -				sec=$1; in_sec=1;
> +				sec=$(NF-1); in_sec=1;
>   			}
>   		}
>   
> 
Tested-by: Nikhil Rao <nikhil.rao@intel.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-17  3:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-16 11:08 Neil Horman
2018-08-17  3:03 ` Rao, Nikhil [this message]
2018-08-21  9:03   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=954d81fa-e977-ac7e-8c5f-fbe2fd186bf4@intel.com \
    --to=nikhil.rao@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).