From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>,
Ranjit Menon <ranjit.menon@intel.com>
Cc: Pallavi Kadam <pallavi.kadam@intel.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, Harini.Ramakrishnan@microsoft.com,
Narcisa.Vasile@microsoft.com, tbashar@mellanox.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] eal: add fnmatch implementation on Windows
Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 18:51:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9687790.nUPlyArG6x@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9807143d-1a85-eef9-5ea2-0609b044b147@intel.com>
01/05/2020 03:08, Ranjit Menon:
> On 4/30/2020 12:30 AM, Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote:
> > On 2020-04-30 08:52 GMT+0200 Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >> 30/04/2020 01:24, Pallavi Kadam:
> >>> Added fnmatch implementation on Windows to support
> >>> log level arguments.
> >>> The source file is with BSD-3-Clause license.
> >>> https://github.com/lattera/freebsd/blob/master/usr.bin/csup/fnmatch.c
> >>
> >> Sorry for the naive question, I don't know Windows programming.
> >>
> >> Do we really need this external code?
> >> Why RtlIsNameInExpression from Windows cannot be used?
> >> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/devnotes/rtlisnameinexpression
> >
> > The general reason not to use Win32 API for globbing is poorly documented
> > contract: what are the exact matching rules? They're definitely incompatible
> > with fnmatch(3). IMO small external code is better than unknown behavior.
> >
> > RtlIsNameInExpression is an internal call for drivers and services with a
> > cumbersome API. PathMatchSpecA is the user-mode interface, but see above.
> >
> > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/shlwapi/nf-shlwapi-pathmatchspeca
> >
>
> I will agree with Dmitry here. The fnmatch external code is shipping,
> production quality code. So it's better to use it than writing something
> new.
OK thank you for the explanations and opinions.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-04 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-29 23:24 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Windows logging Pallavi Kadam
2020-04-29 23:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] eal: initialize eal logging on Windows Pallavi Kadam
2020-04-29 23:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] eal: add fnmatch implementation " Pallavi Kadam
2020-04-30 6:52 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-30 7:30 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2020-05-01 1:08 ` Ranjit Menon
2020-05-04 16:51 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2020-04-30 6:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Windows logging Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-30 22:18 ` Kadam, Pallavi
2020-05-06 1:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Pallavi Kadam
2020-05-06 1:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] eal: add fnmatch implementation Pallavi Kadam
2020-05-06 2:24 ` Narcisa Ana Maria Vasile
2020-05-06 1:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] eal: add log support on Windows Pallavi Kadam
2020-05-06 2:20 ` Narcisa Ana Maria Vasile
2020-05-07 10:17 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-07 10:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] Windows logging Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9687790.nUPlyArG6x@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=Harini.Ramakrishnan@microsoft.com \
--cc=Narcisa.Vasile@microsoft.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
--cc=pallavi.kadam@intel.com \
--cc=ranjit.menon@intel.com \
--cc=tbashar@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).