From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7703BA0465 for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Wed, 29 May 2019 13:18:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9AB1B956; Wed, 29 May 2019 13:18:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA791B955 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 29 May 2019 13:18:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B2F73C; Wed, 29 May 2019 07:18:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 29 May 2019 07:18:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=yFQ+d923KFfvb3iz79x9TC4u7GmZe0IlxQ1KfkPsTJs=; b=rhAFApH/6GDx BcIkrkGvRXUn9sTsWZmd6z8vHSRihPJbHprmpKVmZeOnMcj/XbB2wnP+Y1zSSNy7 2yoV24DRE5vHqfeWHHHjF7DYUrDydDCiiIvsopJQCdkkKsNLS5FPsJpFJvMgUkI+ EgzV1dmYVbXtVT/dIq+vgvapzytsda8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=yFQ+d923KFfvb3iz79x9TC4u7GmZe0IlxQ1KfkPsT Js=; b=koK/x39r4QBQvp7GE+vil4kiBTa1ikc+66syqWJ6as4w4tWSKUlg2V4Gm 4ogtSMrmrA4iFy6zFkEffyuvdrRa1fALh5ue2YywBZvgz841zMnS02tpcE8RD8ee LslF1ChopK7mRNqP6hFLLTwVEqbyqMcnXYVsc8rFGKZjZfXipQ3IAUT/YKN6HYWC soKNybU6ypWEhxBSE4cpHt6THxteh+xybr1ouKP4ufaOtGCF8vy7AfDrtt3kbQXT Q01zg+Hs+/yA7FRauUEySHFuk8j6zpECY2WpntBRHDpwQQmM49qufSHdKXZCnBSs TLos127NPNrk6lln+05PXej0im00Q== X-ME-Sender: <xms:emruXPpoLWiX_OS0qKNZ4KMR0nurAMw78s8uUSZ_FUHvyfogQRjsLw> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddruddvjedggedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukf hppeekuddrudekhedrudejhedrheejnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhho mhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:emruXN5DQ1vuRfY65D7_dUGwJCFNHDciv9IzellxVIOca2NusqhJOQ> <xmx:emruXHNG8CBZWRM4rus41UDfLo94PJn42QWb9GxTsMzbFXBUSj_YKA> <xmx:emruXHNanKBpCVOtbEn6OL-VucrXu6jTV6GPatkVZkvsoEadtWkCUQ> <xmx:emruXNIPca2MQyRwNj4p8Gf1qyYsw8VE055EtOwOcDXtAV_Q8lrNzQ> Received: from xps.localnet (57.175.185.81.rev.sfr.net [81.185.175.57]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BBFC3380083; Wed, 29 May 2019 07:18:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> To: Vipin Varghese <vipin.varghese@intel.com> Cc: dev@dpdk.org, marko.kovacevic@intel.com, john.mcnamara@intel.com, sanjay.padubidri@intel.com Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 13:17:52 +0200 Message-ID: <9691966.DS2kSCyb6N@xps> In-Reply-To: <20190523134744.73755-1-vipin.varghese@intel.com> References: <20190507084112.35296-1-vipin.varghese@intel.com> <20190523134744.73755-1-vipin.varghese@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc/testpmd: update compile steps for bpf examples X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> 23/05/2019 15:47, Vipin Varghese: > --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst > +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst > @@ -4651,6 +4651,10 @@ For example: > cd examples/bpf > clang -O2 -target bpf -c t1.c > > +.. note:: > + > + To built other BPF examples, the compiler requires additional command-line options. "To built" -> "To build" I think this note is vague. Don't you think it may confuse user if we don't explicit which kind of options are required?