From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327A4432B7; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 08:23:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC93A402A9; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 08:23:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.188]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47FEF4027F for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 08:23:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from dggpeml100024.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.57]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4SP2rR49cbzVls4; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 15:23:19 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.121.161] (10.67.121.161) by dggpeml100024.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.115) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.31; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 15:22:45 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] common/nfp: use new API to parse kvargs To: Stephen Hemminger CC: , , Chaoyong He , References: <20230314124813.39521-1-fengchengwen@huawei.com> <20231105054539.22303-1-fengchengwen@huawei.com> <20231105054539.22303-5-fengchengwen@huawei.com> <20231105191906.144e7015@hermes.local> From: fengchengwen Message-ID: <96babd79-aa5d-c3ce-58c9-a6566e027857@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 15:22:45 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20231105191906.144e7015@hermes.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.121.161] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To dggpeml100024.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.115) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Hi Stephen, On 2023/11/6 11:19, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Sun, 5 Nov 2023 05:45:38 +0000 > Chengwen Feng wrote: > >> if (rte_kvargs_count(kvargs, RTE_DEVARGS_KEY_CLASS) != 0) { >> - rte_kvargs_process(kvargs, RTE_DEVARGS_KEY_CLASS, >> - nfp_kvarg_dev_class_handler, &dev_class); >> + rte_kvargs_process_opt(kvargs, RTE_DEVARGS_KEY_CLASS, >> + nfp_kvarg_dev_class_handler, &dev_class); >> } > > Since kvargs_process() already does a scan, the kvargs_count() cause an extra pass. will fix in v5 Thanks Chengwen > > . >