From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9689A0A0B; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:00:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6477440693; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:00:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (relay7-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.200]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9034C40687 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:00:36 +0100 (CET) X-Originating-IP: 78.45.89.65 Received: from [192.168.1.23] (ip-78-45-89-65.net.upcbroadband.cz [78.45.89.65]) (Authenticated sender: i.maximets@ovn.org) by relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D7E620014; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 13:00:33 +0000 (UTC) To: Maxime Coquelin , dev@dpdk.org, chenbo.xia@intel.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com, amorenoz@redhat.com, david.marchand@redhat.com, Ian Stokes , Kevin Traynor , Flavio Leitner References: <20210126101639.250481-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> Cc: i.maximets@ovn.org From: Ilya Maximets Message-ID: <971e37fb-3889-ee94-c45c-e05f51b036ba@ovn.org> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:00:33 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210126101639.250481-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/44] net/virtio: Virtio PMD rework X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 1/26/21 11:15 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > > Only functionnal change in this second part is making the > Vhost-user server mode blocking at init time, as long as > a client is not connected. The goal of this change is to > make the Vhost-user support much more robust, as without > blocking, the driver has to assume features that are going > to be supported by the client, which is very fragile and > error prone. As a side-effect, it also simplifies the > logic nin several place of the virtio-user PMD. Hi, Maxime. I didn't actually look at the code, but I have a question. Does above text mean that with this change OVS will hang inside driver_register() or similar function until client is connected to dpdkvhostuser (server mode) port? If so, I think, we will not be able to support server mode in OVS anymore and will have to actually remove it. It's deprecated for a long time now, but I think it might still be in use by some people, especially for virtio-user usecase. Best regards, Ilya Maximets.