From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B06A0597; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 14:53:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971281C1BC; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 14:53:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE7E1C11D; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 14:53:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5214C3; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 08:53:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 08 Apr 2020 08:53:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=Kar9syucMpiZ6U10lPwn2m0J+N0I8PkD5tDNdIM7QEM=; b=S/aCRhrJVe5J 3paFyHw+rG0dAJz4VbKmW+U6zfB4z18zj9IwGnDGIvfRAaePPnF5yLibww06h6js 9BHcdTESDX2GpRTGGFG77TVmg5PObrBAFzSMARGtnkzJPT4+QkRWkzyOOdyY5MJW Ni8T1Cao3KMwRHDvrSdZxl/kbNWlaEY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Kar9syucMpiZ6U10lPwn2m0J+N0I8PkD5tDNdIM7Q EM=; b=KQBT/8crr5TkXWFiIHvICbv6Q2xkuYoXTTIPzclpM2ZUGLtV/ZW2M5qnO BslI9lmNvCUB2phqvY2G2TDHpie7JGJycdxjn0ajXbgS0yi6HPg5p9VgvUzzWKW5 sGwF0CzyDfwXmO+RKO2wJWhV8sewNRwD6uRx+kVkitHByxmgWk6rXZnu/RYC8Ft7 qEpt1BF7uCObTVMVSzl6PKRCT5mJTOkcdT1frMOh5084dkxo2Gx4CoNbJYmebqqI 39Un95RKFQqEIpqZWB5YXgWmQDz7osGWav0qopU+jD8udO2wZ153iKUK6xQIneMX Up+Bne0vfHhb6oDg9BGe9PWIvdIpw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudejgdehjecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkph epjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghr rghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 781633060060; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 08:53:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Pavan Nikhilesh , Jerin Jacob , Lukasz Wojciechowski Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 14:53:17 +0200 Message-ID: <9733532.nUPlyArG6x@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20200408031351.4288-5-l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com> References: <20200312151654.7218-1-l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com> <20200408031351.4288-5-l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 04/13] app/test: fix macro definition X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 08/04/2020 05:13, Lukasz Wojciechowski: > Wrap RTE_TEST_TRACE_FAILURE macro definition into #ifndef clause > as it might be already defined. I think it should not be defined at all. Why not including rte_test.h?