From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF1D6837 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:26:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2016 02:26:47 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,464,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="654923829" Received: from irsmsx153.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.192.75]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2016 02:26:46 -0800 Received: from irsmsx112.ger.corp.intel.com (10.108.20.5) by IRSMSX153.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.192.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:26:45 +0000 Received: from irsmsx101.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.113]) by irsmsx112.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.159]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:26:45 +0000 From: "Kobylinski, MichalX" To: Jerin Jacob Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] add lpm support for NEON Thread-Index: AQHRZZEO9cgxYwRQAE6mS3SmSKofy58ur3NQgAA37wCAArqp0A== Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:26:44 +0000 Message-ID: <987EE72691933347B9F0B5C19E71B5BB1F02CFDC@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1454040645-23864-1-git-send-email-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com> <1455280123-9311-1-git-send-email-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com> <987EE72691933347B9F0B5C19E71B5BB1F02C6E3@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> <20160216164408.GA10571@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20160216164408.GA10571@localhost.localdomain> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.182] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "viktorin@rehivetech.com" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] add lpm support for NEON X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:26:48 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 5:44 PM > To: Kobylinski, MichalX > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; viktorin@rehivetech.com > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] add lpm support for NEON > Importance: High >=20 > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 01:27:02PM +0000, Kobylinski, MichalX wrote: > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jerin Jacob > > > Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 1:29 PM > > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > > Cc: viktorin@rehivetech.com > > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] add lpm support for NEON > > > > [snip] > > > > > > Jerin Jacob (3): > > > lpm: make rte_lpm_lookupx4 API definition architecture agnostic > > > lpm: add support for NEON > > > maintainers: claim responsibility for arm64 specific files of hash = and > > > lpm > > > > > > MAINTAINERS | 3 + > > > app/test/test_lpm.c | 21 ++-- > > > app/test/test_xmmt_ops.h | 67 +++++++++++++ > > > config/defconfig_arm-armv7a-linuxapp-gcc | 3 - > > > config/defconfig_arm64-armv8a-linuxapp-gcc | 3 - > > > lib/librte_lpm/Makefile | 6 ++ > > > lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h | 99 ++----------------- > > > lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_neon.h | 148 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_sse.h | 143 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 9 files changed, 386 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-) create mode > > > 100644 app/test/test_xmmt_ops.h create mode 100644 > > > lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_neon.h create mode 100644 > > > lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_sse.h > > > > > > -- > > > 2.1.0 > > > > Hi Jerin, >=20 > Hi Michal, >=20 > > Are you planning increase next_hop field for ARM? I extended next_hop f= ield > from 8 bits to 24 bits and created structure to configure LPM for x86. >=20 > Yes, I am planning to increase next_hop field for ARM as a separate patch= . Let > this base patchset get merges. >=20 > I will make ARM specific changes for your new feature in 'rte_lpm_lookup= x4' as > a separate patch on top of your series. > So that in case if I want to go back to 8 bit then I can do it >=20 > Jerin Thank you for your answer. Do you prepare separate patch with changes for ARM architecture on the top = my series? If you want I can support you with prepare new patch. Michal >=20 > > Please look at my patchset with proposal increase next_hop field and st= ructure > to configure. > > > > http://patchwork.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10249/ > > http://patchwork.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10250/ > > > > Best Regards, > > Michal > >