From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
"Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: "dpdk-dev" <dev@dpdk.org>, "Jerin Jacob" <jerinj@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] packet data access bug in bpf and pdump libs
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 13:35:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C60B68@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258019197431F@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ananyev,
> Konstantin
> Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2019 1:12 PM
>
> Hi Morten,
>
> >
> > Hi Konstantin and Stephen,
> >
> > I just noticed the same bug in your bpf and pcap libraries:
> >
> > You are using rte_pktmbuf_mtod(), but should be using
> rte_pktmbuf_read(). Otherwise you cannot read data across multiple
> segments.
>
> In plain data buffer mode expected input for BPF program is start of
> first segment packet data.
> Other segments are simply not available to BPF program in that mode.
I understand the implementation, but I still consider this a bug, not a feature.
Why should a BPF program not be able to access all data in packet? It might be used for DPI.
What if header splitting is being used, so the first segment only contains the header? E.g. the first segment on egress could be really small in a multicast scenario.
Furthermore, VLAN information cannot be accessed unless the BPF runtime has access to the mbuf. E.g. BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_ABS, SKF_AD_OFF + SKF_AD_VLAN_TAG) is supposed to read m->vlan_tci.
> AFAIK, cBPF uses the same model.
>
AFAIK, the Linux kernel can read across fragments.
> >
> >
> > Med venlig hilsen / kind regards
> > - Morten Brørup
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-09 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-09 11:03 Morten Brørup
2019-10-09 11:11 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-09 11:35 ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2019-10-09 15:02 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-10-09 15:06 ` Morten Brørup
2019-10-09 15:14 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-10-09 15:20 ` Morten Brørup
2019-10-09 17:24 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-10-10 7:29 ` Morten Brørup
2019-10-10 15:36 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-11 8:01 ` Morten Brørup
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C60B68@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
--to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).