DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Cc: "dpdk-dev" <dev@dpdk.org>, "Jerin Jacob" <jerinj@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] packet data access bug in bpf and pdump libs
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 17:06:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C60B69@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191009080218.3711bef3@hermes.lan>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen@networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2019 5:02 PM
> 
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 11:11:46 +0000
> "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Morten,
> >
> > >
> > > Hi Konstantin and Stephen,
> > >
> > > I just noticed the same bug in your bpf and pcap libraries:
> > >
> > > You are using rte_pktmbuf_mtod(), but should be using
> rte_pktmbuf_read(). Otherwise you cannot read data across multiple
> segments.
> >
> > In plain data buffer mode expected input for BPF program is start of
> first segment packet data.
> > Other segments are simply not available to BPF program in that mode.
> > AFAIK, cBPF uses the same model.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Med venlig hilsen / kind regards
> > > - Morten Brørup
> >
> 
> For packet capture, the BPF program is only allowed to look at first
> segment.
> pktmbuf_read is expensive and can cause a copy.

It is only expensive if going beyond the first segment:

static inline const void *rte_pktmbuf_read(const struct rte_mbuf *m,
	uint32_t off, uint32_t len, void *buf)
{
	if (likely(off + len <= rte_pktmbuf_data_len(m)))
		return rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(m, char *, off);
	else
		return __rte_pktmbuf_read(m, off, len, buf);
}

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-09 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-09 11:03 Morten Brørup
2019-10-09 11:11 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-09 11:35   ` Morten Brørup
2019-10-09 15:02   ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-10-09 15:06     ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2019-10-09 15:14       ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-10-09 15:20         ` Morten Brørup
2019-10-09 17:24           ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-10-10  7:29             ` Morten Brørup
2019-10-10 15:36               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-10-11  8:01                 ` Morten Brørup

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C60B69@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
    --to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).