From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Jeff Guo" <jia.guo@intel.com>,
"Thomas Monjalon" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"Ferruh Yigit" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
"Andrew Rybchenko" <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
Cc: <qiming.yang@intel.com>, <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
<wei.zhao1@intel.com>, <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
<jingjing.wu@intel.com>, <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
<dev@dpdk.org>, <helin.zhang@intel.com>, <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
<barbette@kth.se>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ethdev: rte_eth_rx_burst() requirements for nb_pkts
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 10:40:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C61257@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200827075452.1751-1-jia.guo@intel.com>
Jeff and Ethernet API maintainers Thomas, Ferruh and Andrew,
I'm hijacking this patch thread to propose a small API modification that prevents unnecessarily performance degradations.
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Guo
> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 9:55 AM
>
> The limitation of burst size in vector rx was removed, since it should
> retrieve as much received packets as possible. And also the scattered
> receive path should use a wrapper function to achieve the goal of
> burst maximizing.
>
> This patch set aims to maximize vector rx burst for for
> ixgbe/i40e/ice/iavf PMDs.
>
Now I'm going to be pedantic and say that it still doesn't conform to the rte_eth_rx_burst() API, because the API does not specify any minimum requirement for nb_pkts.
In theory, that could also be fixed in the driver by calling the non-vector function from the vector functions if nb_pkts is too small for the vector implementation.
However, I think that calling rte_eth_rx_burst() with a small nb_pkts is silly and not in the spirit of DPDK, and introducing an additional comparison for a small nb_pkts in the driver vector functions would degrade their performance (only slightly, but anyway).
Instead, I propose that the rte_eth_rx_burst() API is updated with a minimum requirement for nb_pkts. This minimum requirement should be supported by all Ethernet drivers, instead of having minimum requirements for nb_pkts depending on driver and vector function.
I also have a small comment about the description for all the main rx functions:
+/**
+ * vPMD receive routine that reassembles scattered packets.
+ * Main receive routine that can handle arbitrary burst sizes
+ * Notice:
+ * - nb_pkts < RTE_I40E_DESCS_PER_LOOP, just return no packet
+ */
It says "can handle arbitrary burst sizes", but bears a notice that it really cannot. So please remove that line from all these functions.
Med venlig hilsen / kind regards
- Morten Brørup
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-27 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-27 7:54 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/4] maximize vector rx burst for PMDs Jeff Guo
2020-08-27 7:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/4] net/ixgbe: maximize vector rx burst for ixgbe Jeff Guo
2020-08-27 7:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/4] net/i40e: maximize vector rx burst for i40e Jeff Guo
2020-08-27 7:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/4] net/ice: maximize vector rx burst for ice Jeff Guo
2020-08-27 7:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 4/4] net/iavf: maximize vector rx burst for iavf Jeff Guo
2020-08-27 8:40 ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2020-08-27 9:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ethdev: rte_eth_rx_burst() requirements for nb_pkts Bruce Richardson
2020-08-27 9:31 ` Morten Brørup
2020-08-27 9:43 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-08-27 10:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ethdev: rte_eth_rx_burst() requirements fornb_pkts Morten Brørup
2020-08-27 11:41 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-08-28 9:03 ` Morten Brørup
2020-08-28 10:07 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-08-28 10:50 ` Morten Brørup
2020-08-29 10:15 ` Morten Brørup
2020-09-09 6:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] fix vector rx burst for PMDs Jeff Guo
2020-09-09 6:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/5] net/iavf: fix vector rx burst for iavf Jeff Guo
2020-09-09 6:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] net/ixgbe: fix vector rx burst for ixgbe Jeff Guo
[not found] ` <VI1PR0802MB23518C6B517B6EAD8E018CD49E260@VI1PR0802MB2351.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
2020-09-09 9:54 ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-09-09 6:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/5] net/i40e: fix vector rx burst for i40e Jeff Guo
2020-09-09 6:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/5] net/ice: fix vector rx burst for ice Jeff Guo
2020-09-15 7:10 ` Han, YingyaX
2020-09-09 6:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/5] net/fm10k: fix vector rx burst for fm10k Jeff Guo
2020-09-09 6:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] fix vector rx burst for PMDs Wang, Haiyue
2020-09-09 7:03 ` Guo, Jia
2020-09-09 7:05 ` Wang, Haiyue
2020-09-09 7:43 ` Morten Brørup
2020-09-09 7:55 ` Wang, Haiyue
2020-09-09 8:01 ` Guo, Jia
2020-09-17 7:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " Jeff Guo
2020-09-17 7:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/5] net/iavf: fix vector rx burst for iavf Jeff Guo
2020-09-17 7:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/5] net/ixgbe: fix vector rx burst for ixgbe Jeff Guo
2020-09-17 7:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/5] net/i40e: fix vector rx burst for i40e Jeff Guo
2020-09-17 7:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/5] net/ice: fix vector rx burst for ice Jeff Guo
2020-09-17 11:03 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2020-09-18 3:20 ` Guo, Jia
2020-09-18 3:41 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2020-09-18 4:41 ` Guo, Jia
2020-09-18 5:39 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2020-09-17 7:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/5] net/fm10k: fix vector rx burst for fm10k Jeff Guo
2020-10-16 9:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/5] fix vector rx burst for PMDs Jeff Guo
2020-10-16 9:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/5] net/ixgbe: fix vector rx burst for ixgbe Jeff Guo
2020-10-16 9:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/5] net/i40e: fix vector rx burst for i40e Jeff Guo
2020-10-16 9:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/5] net/ice: fix vector rx burst for ice Jeff Guo
2020-10-16 9:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/5] net/fm10k: fix vector rx burst for fm10k Jeff Guo
2020-10-16 9:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/5] net/iavf: fix vector rx burst for iavf Jeff Guo
2020-10-23 5:09 ` Ling, WeiX
2020-10-23 10:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/5] fix vector rx burst for PMDs Zhang, Qi Z
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C61257@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
--to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=barbette@kth.se \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=jia.guo@intel.com \
--cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=wei.zhao1@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).