From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC06AA0524; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 21:36:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46ED3410E1; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 21:36:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smartserver.smartsharesystems.com (smartserver.smartsharesystems.com [77.243.40.215]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78EB540DF6 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 21:36:08 +0200 (CEST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 21:36:01 +0200 Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C6181A@smartserver.smartshare.dk> In-Reply-To: <1835865.ogO8Tvl0ac@thomas> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases Thread-Index: AddYrT93XSiNkDmTSNyeFAuMrEnxsQAAORPw References: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C61817@smartserver.smartshare.dk> <11041276.vyNeVKDHc6@thomas> <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C61818@smartserver.smartshare.dk> <1835865.ogO8Tvl0ac@thomas> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Morten_Br=F8rup?= To: "Thomas Monjalon" , "Ali Alnubani" Cc: Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net] > Sent: Thursday, 3 June 2021 21.18 k-dev] code.dpdk.org bugfix releases >=20 > 03/06/2021 20:15, Morten Br=F8rup: > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas > Monjalon > > > Sent: Thursday, 3 June 2021 18.11 > > > > > > 03/06/2021 17:18, Morten Br=F8rup: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Bugfix releases are missing on code.dpdk.org. > > > > > > > > E.g. version 17.11 is present, but version 17.11.10 is missing. > > > > > > > > Can whoever is the maintainer of code.dpdk.org please fix this. > > > > > > Ali is the admin of dpdk.org. > > > I'm not sure your request is easy because stable releases > > > are in a separate repository dpdk-stable.git. > > > > Ali, it would be great if you can include them. > > Not having easy access to browse the source code of the LTS > > bugfix releases could be a barrier for DPDK users to upgrade > > to the latest LTS bugfix release. >=20 > Actually it's already included (thanks Ali for reminding it to me): > https://code.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/v20.11/source >=20 > There are 2 different repos and that's how it is exposed in this tool. Great... It was just me not knowing where to click. We learn something = new every day! > It may be a bit confusing. > Do you think it would be OK to rename dpdk-stable to dpdk in this = tool? Having learned that the box saying "dpdk" is a dropdown, I headed over = to my favorite Linux source code browser at Bootlin. And they already = have what I was asking for: = https://elixir.bootlin.com/dpdk/latest/source And they call it "dpdk", not "dpdk-stable"... so I support Thomas' = suggestion here. Or alternatively: https://code.dpdk.org/ currently = redirects to https://code.dpdk.org/dpdk/latest/source. Perhaps it could = redirect to https://code.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/latest/source instead. Now, I have another question: What does code.dpdk.org show for "dpdk" = that it does not show for "dpdk-stable"?