From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD16A04A6;
	Fri,  7 Jan 2022 17:28:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7016F40140;
	Fri,  7 Jan 2022 17:28:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smartserver.smartsharesystems.com
 (smartserver.smartsharesystems.com [77.243.40.215])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F21F40042
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  7 Jan 2022 17:27:58 +0100 (CET)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] Spelling comments/text
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 17:27:55 +0100
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D86DEE@smartserver.smartshare.dk>
In-Reply-To: <YdhcNAG5icauqrr0@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: [PATCH v2] Spelling comments/text
Thread-Index: AdgD206/RVwH+gegSAiNpihktzlliAABwd3A
References: <20211126195851.50167-1-jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
 <1848208.taCxCBeP46@thomas>
 <YdgiyTjtFohadpWd@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <820785518.0ifERbkFSE@thomas>
 <YdhcNAG5icauqrr0@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Morten_Br=F8rup?= <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Bruce Richardson" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
 "Thomas Monjalon" <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: "Josh Soref" <jsoref@gmail.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>,
 "Ferruh Yigit" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
 "David Marchand" <david.marchand@redhat.com>
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org

> From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, 7 January 2022 16.29
>=20
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 03:58:27PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 07/01/2022 12:23, Bruce Richardson:
> > > On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 05:52:49PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > 29/11/2021 17:08, Josh Soref:
> > > > > -        * dequeueing once we've filled up the queue, we have
> to benchmark it
> > > > > +        * dequeuing once we've filled up the queue, we have =
to
> benchmark it
> > > >
> > > > I think "dequeueing" is correct.
> > > >
> > > Well, we have "queue" and "queuing" so therefore I would expect =
the
> "e" to
> > > be similarly dropped from the "dequeue" version.
> >
> > When looking on Internet, queueing is preffered over queuing.
> > 	https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/queueing
> > 	https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/60852/queueing-or-
> queuing
> > Best justification: five vowels in a row!
> >
> > Why English people cannot agree on how to write words?

Because they have two different dictionaries: US English and British =
English. E.g. "color" is correct in one territory, while "colour" is =
correct in another territory.

>=20
> Being Irish, I'm not sure I can answer that! :-)
>=20
> My preference here is the shorter "queuing" version suggested, and it
> was
> what dictionary.com suggested under "queue" entry. My preference is
> largely
> based on consistency with other words which end in "ue":
> "argue" -> "arguing", "accrue" -> "accruing".

Being somewhat a language nerd, I would like to know your opinions about =
"aging" vs. "ageing", in the context of timing out obsolete entries in =
e.g. a MAC table?

Or is "ageing" an action, and "aging" a state?

>=20
> > Let's all use French, it's simpler :)
> >
> I don't think I have enough accent keys on my keyboard :-)