DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Thomas Monjalon" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"Olivier Matz" <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
	"Ben Magistro" <koncept1@gmail.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <ben.magistro@trinitycyber.com>,
	"Stefan Baranoff" <stefan.baranoff@trinitycyber.com>,
	<stable@dpdk.org>, "Luca Boccassi" <bluca@debian.org>,
	"Christian Ehrhardt" <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>,
	"Xueming(Steven) Li" <xuemingl@nvidia.com>,
	"Kevin Traynor" <ktraynor@redhat.com>, <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] mbuf: expose outer vlan in mbuf dump
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:59:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D86FDA@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6763347.18pcnM708K@thomas>

> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, 13 April 2022 14.03
> 
> 12/04/2022 18:11, Ben Magistro:
> > Was there a consensus on if this should be re-drafted as a bug and
> fixes or
> > left as a backportable feature/improvement?  I am good either way,
> just
> > wanted to clarify if I had an additional action at this time.
> 
> There is no consensus but that's a detail.
> 
> In any case we agree to backport it.
> I'll merge it with Cc: stable@dpdk.org

+1 to that, Thomas!

> 
> 
> > On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 3:33 AM Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 05:51:05PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > 04/04/2022 12:33, Kevin Traynor:
> > > > > On 04/04/2022 07:15, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > > > >> From: Ben Magistro [mailto:koncept1@gmail.com]
> > > > > >> Sent: Monday, 4 April 2022 02.57
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Enable printing of the outer vlan if flags indicate it is
> present.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Signed-off-by: Ben Magistro <koncept1@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
> > >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> ---
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> While troubleshooting some QinQ offloads with various Intel
> i40e
> > > > > >> firmware[1], it was
> > > > > >> helpful to expose the outer vlan in the dump mbuf calls.
> This
> > > should
> > > > > >> be straightforward
> > > > > >> to backport and happy to do the work if accepted. I
> understand that
> > > > > >> this may not be a
> > > > > >> widely supported capability at this time, so we are okay if
> this is
> > > not
> > > > > >> accepted and
> > > > > >> we just maintain a local patch.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Features are usually not backported, only bug fixes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > However, since this patch proved helpful finding a bug, and
> it is
> > > very simple, it could be considered by the LTS maintainers.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Suggest to tag the patch with 'Cc: stable@dpdk.org' to indicate
> it is
> > > > > requested for stable branches. It will be caught by stable
> maintainer
> > > > > filters when it is time for backports and can be discussed
> further
> > > then.
> > > >
> > > > I think it is a bug.
> > > > What was introduced first? the function or the field?
> > > > Please find the commit where it should have been done
> > > > and mark it with "Fixes:" syntax + Cc:stable.
> > >
> > > The vlan dump was introduced by commit 5b6eaea8ea7c ("mbuf: display
> more
> > > fields in dump"), but I don't think we can say it's a bug. To me,
> it is
> > > an enhancement that could be backported, because there is a benefit
> with
> > > a very low risk.
> > >
> >
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-13 12:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-04  0:56 Ben Magistro
2022-04-04  6:15 ` Morten Brørup
2022-04-04 10:33   ` Kevin Traynor
2022-04-05 15:51     ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-04-06  7:33       ` Olivier Matz
2022-04-12 16:11         ` Ben Magistro
2022-04-13 12:02           ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-04-13 12:59             ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2022-06-01  9:18               ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D86FDA@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
    --to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=ben.magistro@trinitycyber.com \
    --cc=bluca@debian.org \
    --cc=christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=koncept1@gmail.com \
    --cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stefan.baranoff@trinitycyber.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=xuemingl@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).