From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33972A00C3; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 09:06:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF06C410FB; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 09:06:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from smartserver.smartsharesystems.com (smartserver.smartsharesystems.com [77.243.40.215]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E677410D7 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 09:06:17 +0100 (CET) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: NIC support for IOVA as VA X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 09:06:16 +0100 Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D87562@smartserver.smartshare.dk> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: NIC support for IOVA as VA Thread-Index: AdkKEsgDthvQEysxQ5uJYqZEREKUuQ== From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Morten_Br=F8rup?= To: X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Should support for IOVA as VA be listed under NIC features [1]? [1]: http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/ Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards, -Morten Br=F8rup