From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 534E041D40; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 17:32:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C27430C4; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 17:32:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from smartserver.smartsharesystems.com (smartserver.smartsharesystems.com [77.243.40.215]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE99430C1 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 17:32:26 +0100 (CET) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] test/mempool: add zero-copy API's Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 17:32:22 +0100 Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D8776D@smartserver.smartshare.dk> In-Reply-To: <3410602.WBkqHH8m98@thomas> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [PATCH v2 2/2] test/mempool: add zero-copy API's Thread-Index: AdlGuu7isp0TPnbSRWi/MqxtwbWG8QAHqTBw References: <20230209062501.142828-1-kamalakshitha.aligeri@arm.com> <2080056.htQpZWrp2x@thomas> <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D87768@smartserver.smartshare.dk> <3410602.WBkqHH8m98@thomas> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Morten_Br=F8rup?= To: "Thomas Monjalon" , , , "Kamalakshitha Aligeri" Cc: , , , , "Honnappa Nagarahalli" , "Ruifeng Wang" , "Feifei Wang" , , , "nd" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net] > Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2023 13.41 >=20 > 22/02/2023 09:24, Morten Br=F8rup: > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net] > > > Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2023 09.01 > > > > > > 21/02/2023 21:18, Kamalakshitha Aligeri: > > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > > > > > Do you want me to squash the unit tests in the mempool lib patch > or do I > > > have to wait for the reviews from mempool maintainers > > > > > > Yes I think you can do the squash if Morten agrees. > > > > Yes, I agree. And if there are any more changes required before the > code is accepted by the maintainers, I will let Kamalakshitha make = those > changes. > > > > > > How should the different acks/review tags be handled when squashing > two patches into one? > > > > The library patch has: > > > > Signed-off-by: Morten Br=F8rup > > Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev > > Acked-by: Chengwen Feng > > Acked-by: Kamalakshitha Aligeri > > > > And the test patch has: > > > > Signed-off-by: Kamalakshitha Aligeri > > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang > > Reviewed-by: Feifei Wang > > Acked-by: Morten Br=F8rup >=20 > The cleanest is to remove Reviewed and Acked-by and let reviewer check > again. > About the sign-off, you keep both. > About the authorship, you must choose one. Kamalakshitha, since I designed and fought for the mempool zero-copy = API, which I consider the core part of the patch, I would prefer being = designated as the author of the squashed patch. I'm no expert at git, but I think the "From" tag indicates the author. = So the tags in the squashed patch should be: From: Morten Br=F8rup Signed-off-by: Morten Br=F8rup Signed-off-by: Kamalakshitha Aligeri