From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58B6430B2; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 11:23:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D09B410D7; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 11:23:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dkmailrelay1.smartsharesystems.com (smartserver.smartsharesystems.com [77.243.40.215]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF9A40A80 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 11:23:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smartserver.smartsharesystems.com (smartserver.smartsharesys.local [192.168.4.10]) by dkmailrelay1.smartsharesystems.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9010F20718; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 11:23:39 +0200 (CEST) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Ring library optimization idea Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2023 11:23:38 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D87B21@smartserver.smartshare.dk> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Ring library optimization idea Thread-Index: AdnTSADDofJIeE2PSx6EnyX+/hQSng== From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Morten_Br=F8rup?= To: Cc: , X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Most of the fast path ring library functions access the two cache lines = containing respectively the r->prod and r->cons structures. Some of the fast path functions also have to fetch r->capacity and = r->mask, which reside in another cache line. What do you think about adding shadow variables of r->capacity and = r->mask to the same cache line as r->prod, to improve ring library = performance (by avoiding having to read a third cache line) when under = CPU cache pressure? -Morten